Events
Jenny Speck to Speak at Lockton U.S. Energy Risk Summit
Partner Jenny Speck will speak at Lockton’s U.S. Energy Risk Summit on November 12, 2026, in Houston, Texas. The summit …
November 12, 2026
November 12, 2026 • 1-minute read
Insight
Client Alerts
July 16, 2026 • 5-minute read
On July 13, 2026, the Department of War (DoW) announced that it was immediately suspending Phase II of its Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) program, citing concerns about the program’s impact on small, medium, and non-traditional defense contractors and their ability to deliver critical capabilities to DoW. The decision marks a significant change of direction from DoW’s years-long effort to launch CMMC as a means of replacing self-assessments of cybersecurity compliance with a third-party verification system. While the suspension of the CMMC verification requirements signals a potential easing of compliance burdens for defense contractors, they should remain aware that the underlying cybersecurity requirements have not changed, thereby presenting continuing compliance challenges and the significant risk of False Claims Act (FCA) enforcement.
In this alert, we provide a summary of DoW’s decision to suspend, for now, the requirement for assessments by CMMC Third-Party Assessment Organizations (C3PAOs) and the Defense Industrial Base Cybersecurity Assessment Center (DIBCAC) as prerequisites to contract awards while DoW conducts a 60-day review to determine the future of the CMMC program.
As discussed in a prior update,1 the CMMC program established a certification framework requiring defense contractors to demonstrate cybersecurity compliance at three levels:
Requirements for Level 1 or Level 2 self-assessments (CMMC Phase I) went into effect on November 10, 2025. The next implementation phase (CMMC Phase II) to require mandatory Level 2 C3PAO certifications was set to begin on November 10, 2026, although some procuring activities had already begun to include Phase II requirements in solicitations.
The small business community, among other stakeholders, has long raised concerns about the cost and compliance burdens on companies associated with performing self-assessments and obtaining third-party assessments. In addition, the limited number of approved C3PAOs was notably hindering the ability for contractors to obtain the required third-party assessment that would be required to proceed with winning new contracts after the Phase II rollout. Thus, with the deadline for Phase II implementation looming, there was a real risk that numerous current DoW contractors would no longer be eligible to compete for and win new contracts upon the implementation of the third-party attestation requirements.
On July 13, 2026, the DoW Chief Information Office (CIO) issued a memorandum suspending implementation efforts for C3PAO and certain government-led assessments immediately, pending a 60-day strategic review of the CMMC program.2 DoW justified the suspension and review by citing compliance costs for small businesses, insufficient C3PAO capacity to assess thousands of contractors, and complex regulatory timelines pushing nontraditional defense contractors out of the defense industrial base.
As a part of the 60-day CMMC review, DoW also published a request for information inviting defense contractors to provide feedback regarding the 110 NIST SP 800-171 controls that comprise the underlying CMMC Level 2 standards against which contractors are assessed. Responses are due on August 14, 2026.
Following the suspension announcement, the Under Secretary of War for Acquisition and Sustainment approved the public release of a memorandum for DoW acquisition personnel.3 Significantly, the memorandum directs program offices and requiring activities to include only CMMC Level 1 and Level 2 self-assessment requirements in future solicitations and to amend already-issued solicitations to remove Level 2 C3PAO or Level 3 government-led assessment requirements. Of particular note, the memorandum directed Contracting Officers to remove any Level 2 C3PAO or Level 3 government-led assessment requirements from existing contracts via contract modification prior to the next option period or during the next scheduled administrative modification.
Contractors should take note of what the CMMC suspension does and does not do. DoW has (for now) suspended the third-party assessment requirements as a prerequisite to being awarded new contracts; but DoW has not eliminated defense contractors’ existing obligation to substantively comply with the NIST 800 171 v2 cybersecurity controls. The following provisions remain firmly in place and binding on contractors:
The DoW CIO memorandum confirms that DoW will continue to exercise its separate authority to conduct cybersecurity compliance verification assessments of contractors. The suspension removes government-led assessments only as a contract award condition, and DoW has not curtailed the standing authority of DIBCAC to audit any defense contractor’s implementation of NIST SP 800-171 controls as part of ongoing contract administration and enforcement.
Further, the suspension of CMMC implementation does not diminish the ongoing risks of potential liability for cybersecurity non-compliance under the FCA. Alleged misrepresentations related to cybersecurity and compliance with applicable contract requirements are an ongoing area of focus for the Department of Justice (DOJ) and qui tam whistleblowers known as relators. DOJ is actively pursuing FCA investigations involving alleged misrepresentations of cybersecurity compliance status, which may be discovered through a DIBCAC cybersecurity audit.4 Without C3PAO certifications, self-assessment certifications and SPRS score submissions will continue to be an area of potential exposure for companies, as evidenced by recent DOJ settlements. Defense contractors must ensure that their self-certified cybersecurity submissions accurately reflect their actual compliance status.
Despite the 60-day suspension of CMMC implementation, cybersecurity and information protection remains a Government priority. On June 23, 2026, as part of the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul, the FAR Council published a proposed rule that would establish Government-wide safeguarding requirements for CUI. If finalized, the rule would require all federal contractors handling CUI to implement NIST SP 800-171 v3 security controls.5 The proposed rule would also harmonize CUI incident reporting at 72 hours across the federal Government, aligning with the existing DFARS standard. Thus, even if the cybersecurity compliance certification regime under CMMC changes as a result of DoW’s strategic review, CUI protection obligations are poised to expand beyond DoW to all federal agencies, reinforcing the importance of maintaining robust cybersecurity programs.
Conclusion
DoW’s decision to suspend CMMC is, as of now, a temporary step, but it signals a potential reversion to the self-assessment regime that CMMC was supposed to replace. The cybersecurity threats facing the Government and the Defense Industrial Base continue to expand, and companies will be expected to comply with existing cybersecurity requirements and to combat new threats to the disclosure of sensitive Government information as they arise. The suspension provides a 60-day reprieve from third-party and government-led assessment requirements as contractual prerequisites, but it does not diminish the substantive cybersecurity compliance obligations that defense contractors must satisfy. Moreover, cybersecurity remains a Government priority, as evidenced by the recently proposed FAR amendment to expand CUI protection requirements Government-wide, signaling that certain cybersecurity compliance obligations and compliance with existing NIST 800-171 standards may expand in scope regardless of CMMC’s fate. Defense contractors should continue to review the cybersecurity requirements in their existing contracts, ensure their self-certifications accurately reflect their compliance posture, and monitor developments on CMMC reform.
2 https://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/Library/CMMC-ReformMemo.pdf
3 https://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/Library/ImplementingSuspensionCMMC-PhaseII.pdf
This information is provided by Vinson & Elkins LLP for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended, nor should it be construed, as legal advice.
Discover our latest:
Events
Jenny Speck to Speak at Lockton U.S. Energy Risk Summit
Partner Jenny Speck will speak at Lockton’s U.S. Energy Risk Summit on November 12, 2026, in Houston, Texas. The summit …
November 12, 2026
November 12, 2026 • 1-minute read
CLE Events
Sixth Annual Navigating the Annual Meeting and Reporting Season
Join leading practitioners and industry voices for a timely discussion of the legal, regulatory, and governance developments shaping the next proxy season.
November 11, 2026
November 11, 2026 • 2-minute read
Events
Jenny Speck Speaking at 2026 AFCC Global Biobased Economy Conference
Partner Jenny Speck will speak at the 2026 AFCC Global Biobased Economy Conference & Exhibit in a session titled “Tax …
November 3, 2026
November 3, 2026 • 1-minute read
Articles
Executive Order 14421: Managing the Risk of a Ban on Chinese Grid Equipment
The nation’s electric grid depends heavily on foreign-made equipment, much of it from China. Depending on how the Dept. of …
October 30, 2026
October 30, 2026 • 1-minute read
Podcasts
Powering Progress Episode 14 – Environmental Litigation and the New Data Center Playbook
This series has explored the extraordinary investment flowing into data centers and the challenges surrounding power, real estate, financing, and …
October 29, 2026
October 29, 2026 • 14-minute read
Media Coverage
Stephanie Noble Featured in Energy & Mineral Law Foundation Member Spotlight
Partner Stephanie Noble was featured in the Energy & Mineral Law Foundation (EMLF) Member Spotlight, where she discussed her path …
October 28, 2026
October 28, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins advised GridStor in connection with the financing of White Tank, a 100 MW / 400 MWh stand-alone …
October 28, 2026
October 28, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins Advises on Bison Oil & Gas IV’s Inaugural $600 Million Senior Notes Offering
Vinson & Elkins advised the initial purchasers in connection with Bison Oil & Gas IV, LLC’s inaugural private offering of …
October 28, 2026
October 28, 2026 • 1-minute read
Firm News
Vinson & Elkins Hires Corporate Partner Lisa Morales
Morales is an experienced M&A lawyer who advises major public companies, financial institutions, and private capital clients on strategic transactions. …
October 28, 2026
October 28, 2026 • 2-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins Represents Perella Weinberg Partners as Financial Advisor in EQT Takeover of Qiagen
Vinson & Elkins is representing Perella Weinberg Partners as financial advisor to the Supervisory Board of Qiagen N.V. in connection …
October 22, 2026
October 22, 2026 • 1-minute read
Articles
Law Is a Practice. So Is Business Development.
Randi Revisore, Lauren Alford, and DeAnna Englezos reflect on two years of success leading BD Lab — Vinson & Elkins’ …
July 14, 2026 • V&E+ | Values
July 14, 2026 • 7-minute read
Articles
Data Center Dealmakers: A New Era of Power and Compute
Vinson & Elkins Partners Creighton Smith and Milam Newby share the story behind a groundbreaking AI infrastructure transaction — and …
June 15, 2026 • V&E+ Ventures
June 15, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Mid-Level Mindset: Empowering Lawyers Through a Pivotal Career Stage
Vinson & Elkins’ inaugural Mid-Level Associate Summit brought lawyers from across the firm to Houston for three days of learning …
March 31, 2026
March 31, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Pro Bono at Vinson & Elkins: Lawyers Changing Lives
Pro Bono Counsel Parker Cragg reflects on a life dedicated to service, returning to Vinson & Elkins, and wisdom he has picked up along the way.
October 20, 2025 • V&E+ Values
October 20, 2025 • 6-minute read
Client Alerts
The Genuine Cup: Soccer Strengthens Our Communities
Vinson & Elkins Chair Keith Fullenweider and Vice Chair Hilary Preston, alongside partners Creighton Smith and Jenny Speck, sit down for conversation on a global soccer tournament, the firm’s support for it, and their experience as spectators and volunteers.
August 27, 2025 • V&E+ Values
August 27, 2025 • 7-minute read
Thoughts or questions? Send us a note, and we’ll connect you with the right person.
our People
Please note that any communication with Vinson & Elkins via e-mail through this website does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with V&E. Please do not send any confidential information. A conflicts-of-interest procedure must be completed by V&E prior to establishment of an attorney-client relationship. When you execute an engagement letter from V&E you will be our client, and you may then exchange information freely with a V&E attorney.
By clicking “Accept,” you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if it is highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.