Where We Excel


Leveraging our extensive experience in patent litigation at the trial level, Vinson & Elkins’ patent litigators routinely represent clients before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit as an integral part of our patent litigation practice. Our team includes a number of former clerks from the U.S. Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit, as well as numerous other federal and state courts of appeal.

V&E’s patent litigation lawyers provide legal and strategic counseling to clients to frame their arguments before the Federal Circuit. Because patent cases often include complex commercial, antitrust, and licensing issues—and because complex commercial cases increasingly include patent claims—our appellate teams harness V&E’s broad litigation experience by partnering with lawyers from those practices as well.

Experience

  • (Fed. Cir.); (N.D. Cal.) — Represented leading Internet companies in consolidated patent infringement actions related to distributed processing technology; obtained judgment on the pleadings invalidating all three asserted patents for claiming unpatentable subject matter; the judgment was affirmed by the Federal Circuit

  • (Fed. Cir.); (D. Del.) — Defended several major gaming companies in a patent infringement lawsuit related to peer-to-peer network technologies; obtained summary judgment of non-infringement after successful claim construction proceedings; Federal Circuit affirmed on appeal

  • (Fed. Circ.); (S.D. Tex.) — Defended AKM Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Moblize, Inc., a provider of real-time data solutions for oil well monitoring and analysis, in a patent infringement case filed by a competitor seeking in excess of $200M and a preliminary injunction; obtained dismissal with prejudice and invalidity of the asserted patent based on unpatentable subject matter, which was affirmed on appeal

  • (S.D.N.Y.); (Fed. Cir.) — Obtained a complete affirmance of the dismissal of all claims against a leading consumer electronics and digital media provider before the Federal Circuit; claims included fraud, breach of contract, patent infringement, and trademark infringement

  • (N.D. Tex.); (Fed.Cir.) — Obtained a complete victory for a client accused of patent infringement and misappropriation of trade secrets in connection with computer software and methods for horizontal drilling of oil and gas wells; after obtaining a summary judgment on the trade secrets claim, V&E tried the case and obtained a judgment for our client; we obtained an affirmance of the judgment on appeal 

  • (S.D. Tex.); (Fed. Cir.); (5th Cir.) — Represented an oilfield services client from claims of breach of a patent license agreement; after we successfully established federal subject matter jurisdiction, the case settled on favorable terms

You Have Goals. Let’s Get Started

At Vinson & Elkins, we bring decades of knowledge, skill, and experience to our clients’ most complex legal matters.

Discover our latest:

Insights

Client Alerts

Two Good to Be True? The SEC Proposes Optional Semiannual Reporting

On May 5, 2026, the SEC proposed to provide public companies the option of filing interim reports semiannually on new …

May 7, 2026

May 7, 2026 • 4-minute read

Articles

Innovation Governance: 5 Strategies to Mitigate Intellectual Property Risks

Innovative companies stand out from their competitors, attracting talent and investment, boosting revenue and margins, earning new customers and deep …

February 2, 2026

February 2, 2026 • 2-minute read

Client Alerts

Section 337 Gets a Makeover: Federal Circuit Expands Economic Domestic Industry Criteria

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) recently issued a landmark decision in Lashify, Inc. v. International Trade Commission,1 expanding what expenditures count to prove the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement, in a move that could significantly impact companies involved in Section 337 investigations before the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”).

March 12, 2025 • V&E Intellectual Property Update

March 12, 2025 • 5-minute read

AOL - International Trade Commission Lit

Client Alerts

Supreme Court Oral Argument in Jarkesy Laser-Focused on Seventh Amendment Trial Right in Agency Civil Penalty Enforcement Actions

On November 29, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in a critically important administrative law case, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy, No. 22-859.

November 30, 2023 • V&E Energy Update

November 30, 2023 • 5-minute read

Supreme Court Decision Establishes Important Precedent for Prisoners Seeking Access to Judicial System Background Image