Capabilities
trending now
Vinson & Elkins attorneys regularly defend high-stakes class actions and complex multi-district litigation (MDL) across the country. We have broad and deep experience in industries frequently targeted in class and MDL actions, including aviation, electronics and technology, manufacturing, oil and gas, and securities. We thrive in the web of procedural and substantive issues that arise in these complex matters, always guided—and driven—by our clients’ business goals.
V&E handles all aspects of class actions, mass actions, and multi-district litigation, from filing through trial and appeal. When civil litigation proceeds alongside a parallel government inquiry or investigation, our class-action and MDL team works hand-in-hand with our white collar practice to coordinate the defense of potential civil and criminal liability. In recent years, our lawyers have performed these roles with great success in many substantive areas, including antitrust, securities, toxic torts, and products liability.
Class certification is often the bet-the-company stage of a bet-the-company case. Through broad experience, our lawyers have gained a deep appreciation of the intricacies of class certification under both state and federal law. Most importantly, though, our lawyers know how to develop the facts unique to a case and how to marshal those unique facts to oppose class certification in a particular court. We know, for example, how to find and use economic data and analysis to combat a fraud-on-the-market theory in a securities class action or a presumption of antitrust injury in a price-fixing MDL. We have experience developing the unique facts of a particular market or industry to show the claims of putative class members are so different that a class cannot be certified.
We also understand the day-to-day of complex litigation, such as how to work with—and lead—a large joint-defense group to coordinate the defense of a complex, multi-year, multi-defendant class action or MDL. We know how to spread the labor as required to achieve results and manage costs. Just as importantly, we know how to do so without losing our ability to advocate our clients’ individual interests when necessary. The same is true when a lone defendant faces simultaneous litigation of a single issue in several courts scattered around the country: we know how to pursue favorable results efficiently. As national coordinating counsel engaged to supervise many similar cases pending in state and federal courts around the country, we have helped manufacturers, retailers, and others minimize duplication of effort and ensure that the local lawyers trying individual cases for our clients in their local courts have and use the shared knowledge of a well-coordinated, nationwide defense.
Class actions often pose huge financial risks—frequently, the greatest our clients will ever face. They can also threaten the mergers, acquisitions, and innovations that propel businesses into new markets and new eras. We understand these perils. So, we work closely with our clients to draft practical case strategies to meet client objectives both inside and outside the courtroom, concentrating not only on the immediate outcome of a particular motion or trial, but also on protecting our clients’ reputations and controlling collateral consequences in business transactions, in other litigation, and in regulatory matters. We never lose sight of the ball—our clients’ long-term goals. In short, we are courtroom lawyers who litigate class actions with both power and finesse, always mindful of managing potential exposure in ways best calculated to achieve clients’ overall business objectives.
Representing Delta Dental member companies in connection with a series of consolidated class actions alleging that Delta Dental companies underpaid dentists
Representing national property management companies in connection with a series of consolidated class actions alleging the existence of a conspiracy to increase or stabilize the price of apartments using a common algorithm
Representing national real estate brokerage and regional real estate trade group in antitrust class actions alleging a conspiracy to force home-sellers and home-buyers to pay inflated sales commissions to real estate brokerages
Lead counsel for largest pure-play E&P shale oil company in the Delaware Basin in consolidated antitrust consumer class actions alleging conspiracy to decrease domestic shale oil production; In re Shale Oil Antitrust Litig., MDL No. 3119 (D. N.M.)
(Tex. Dist. – Harris Cnty.) — Representing transmission and distribution utilities (TDUs) in over 100 cases in a multidistrict litigation (MDL) involving various claims arising from Winter Storm Uri
(Tex. Dist. – Harris Cnty.) — Representing various natural gas related entities and financial institutions in a dozen cases in a multidistrict litigation (MDL) involving various claims arising from Winter Storm Uri
Defended multiple clients in Texas federal court in multidistrict litigation comprising a series of cases brought by a purported national class of royalty interest owners alleging antitrust violations, fraud, conspiracy, and breach of contract
Defended a large independent oil and gas producer in multiple related lawsuits, both individual and class, alleging underpayment of royalties on natural gas and natural gas liquids
(E.D. Mich.) — Defending a leading automobile parts supplier and its affiliates in class action multi-district litigation pending in the Eastern District of Michigan
(W.D. Okla.) — Defeated class certification on state-wide royalty underpayment claims in Oklahoma federal court
(N.D. Ga.) — Representing an airline in an MDL putative class action alleging price-fixing of checked baggage fees, where plaintiffs seek more than $1 billion in damages before trebling
(D.N.M.) — Defeated certification of a nationwide class action filed against an insurance company involving the proper calculation and payment of lost wage claims
Successfully represented a financial services firm in In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation, an antitrust MDL putative class action and series of opt-out lawsuits alleging bid-rigging in the municipal derivatives industry
(Kan.) — Obtained a district court order overruling objections to approval of a class action royalty settlement and affirmance of the district court order by the Kansas Supreme Court
(N.D. Cal.) — Defending a foreign supplier and its U.S.-based affiliate in class action multi-district litigation related to allegations of price-fixing in the lithium ion batteries industry
(S.D.N.Y.) — Obtained favorable settlement on behalf of publicly traded frac sand producer and supplier and its directors and officers in federal securities class action lawsuit alleging violations of Section 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act and Section 11 of the Securities Act arising from initial public offering; obtained dismissal in related derivative litigation in Texas state court
(Md. Cir.) — Obtained a favorable settlement on behalf of an insurance company in a putative class action involving the alleged late payment of PIP claims
(Tex. Dist. − Dallas Cnty.) — Represented Texas’ largest electric transmission and distribution utility, securing a dismissal of a consumer class action relating to the implementation of advanced meters
Representation of technology companies in products claims, including those involved in wearable technology in product liability and class action claims; routinely counsels consumer products technology companies on risk avoidance issues
At Vinson & Elkins, we bring decades of knowledge, skill, and experience to our clients’ most complex legal matters.
Discover our latest:
Client Alerts
On March 10, 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit published an opinion in Trauernicht v. Genworth Financial, Inc., No. 24-1880, reversing and vacating a district court order certifying a mandatory class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(1) in a breach of fiduciary duty case under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”).
March 16, 2026
March 16, 2026 • 7-minute read
Client Alerts
Two High Court Securities Cases Could Clarify Pleading Rules
In granting certiorari in Facebook Inc. v. Amalgamated Bank and Nvidia Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB, the U.S. Supreme Court signaled its intention to provide further guidance concerning application of the heightened standard for pleading private securities fraud claims mandated by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.
October 4, 2024 • Published by Law360 on October 3, 2024
October 4, 2024 • 1-minute read
Client Alerts
Vinson & Elkins was again selected to be featured as the sole Complex Commercial Litigation firm in the U.S. to contribute to Lexology’s “Getting the Deal Through” publication.
September 26, 2023 • Published by Law Business Research Ltd
September 26, 2023 • 1-minute read
Client Alerts
On June 23, 2023, the Texas Supreme Court issued a decision embracing the rule that an investor can engage in customary investment practices without becoming liable for torts committed by a portfolio company.
June 29, 2023 • V&E Corporate Update
June 29, 2023 • 2-minute read
