Events
Jenny Speck to Speak at Lockton U.S. Energy Risk Summit
Partner Jenny Speck will speak at Lockton’s U.S. Energy Risk Summit on November 12, 2026, in Houston, Texas. The summit …
November 12, 2026
November 12, 2026 • 1-minute read
In granting certiorari in Facebook Inc. v. Amalgamated Bank and Nvidia Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB, the U.S. Supreme Court signaled its intention to provide further guidance concerning application of the heightened standard for pleading private securities fraud claims mandated by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.1
In the process, the high court may resolve disagreements among different courts of appeals regarding the requirements for pleading scienter and falsity — two key elements of claims brought under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5.2
The pair of securities cases is scheduled for argument before the high court in November.
In the Facebook action, the Supreme Court is set to review a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reviving Section 10(b) claims against Facebook — now Meta Platforms Inc. — related to alleged disclosure failures surrounding Cambridge Analytica’s wrongful acquisition and use of Facebook user data.3
Specifically, the Supreme Court will examine whether risk disclosures are rendered false or misleading when they do not state that a disclosed risk has actually materialized in the past, even if that past event presents no known risk of ongoing or future business harm.4
Nvidia arises from a second Ninth Circuit decision involving a Section 10(b) claim against a technology company.5 That appeal focuses on (1) whether plaintiffs seeking to allege scienter — basically, an intent to deceive — based on internal company documents must plead the content of those documents with particularity; and (2) whether a plaintiff can adequately plead falsity by relying on an expert opinion instead of particularized factual allegations.6
This information is provided by Vinson & Elkins LLP for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended, nor should it be construed, as legal advice.
