Events
Jenny Speck to Speak at Lockton U.S. Energy Risk Summit
Partner Jenny Speck will speak at Lockton’s U.S. Energy Risk Summit on November 12, 2026, in Houston, Texas. The summit …
November 12, 2026
November 12, 2026 • 1-minute read
Insight
Client Alerts
V&E Tax Update
January 13, 2025 • 4-minute read
The Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) have released final regulations designating so-called “basis-shifting” transactions among related parties as “transactions of interest.” (Our prior coverage of the IRS’s guidance package aimed at related-party basis adjustment transactions can be found here and our prior coverage of the IRS’s large partnership compliance initiative can be found here.) Last month, Treasury claimed to be examining basis-shifting transactions that would yield more than $100 billion of additional taxes if the IRS is successful — double the amount the IRS estimated in June 2024. Under the final regulations, which are scheduled to be published January 14, 2025, material advisors and participants alike must disclose these and “substantially similar” transactions to the IRS, with penalties for non-compliance. As described below, the final regulations largely adopt the sweeping approach of the proposed regulations as provided in the guidance package released on June 18, 2024. The most significant change is a six-year lookback, which reduces, but does not eliminate, retroactivity concerns. In addition, while reporting deadlines are extended a modest 90 days, the minimum dollar threshold is increased, and some relief is given to publicly traded partnerships, the reporting burden will still be substantial. There is, however, a possibility that the next Congress will take action that effectively voids the regulations under the “lookback” period of the Congressional Review Act (“CRA”), as well as the potential for a pre-enforcement challenge under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”).
The final regulations identify specific partnership related-party basis adjustment transactions as transactions of interest and require disclosure of participation in such transactions and “substantially similar” transactions. The final regulations apply prospectively as well as to transactions of calendar-year taxpayers that took place on or after January 1, 2019.
Partnerships and partners that participate in a related-party basis adjustment transaction must file IRS Form 8886, Reportable Transaction Disclosure Statement, with the Office of Tax Shelter Analysis (“OTSA”) for each taxable year of participation. In general, participation includes receipt of a basis adjustment as the result of a related-party basis adjustment transaction, and any realization of a tax benefit from such basis adjustment. Disclosure must include detailed information about the transaction, including the names and identifying numbers of all participants, basis adjustments, and any Federal income tax consequences realized during the taxable year. Calendar-year partnerships and partners that participated in a related-party basis adjustment transaction on or after January 1, 2019 and before January 14, 2025 must disclose such transactions by July 13, 2025. For transactions on or after January 14, 2025, disclosure must be made on a timely-filed tax return for every year of participation.
Material advisors with respect to related-party basis adjustment transactions must generally make disclosures by filing IRS Form 8918, Material Advisor Disclosure Statement, with OTSA by the last day of the month following the end of the calendar quarter in which they become material advisors with respect to a transaction of interest. For transactions entered into on or after January 1, 2019 and before January 14, 2025, material advisors must make such disclosures by April 30, 2025 plus 90 days (July 29, 2025). Notably, the regulations do not provide any special rules that would limit the disclosure obligations of material advisors to only those transactions of which they are aware.
The proposed regulations were widely criticized as unnecessary, overbroad, and impermissibly retroactive. (See our prior coverage here.) In the preamble to the final regulations, the Treasury repeatedly doubles-down on its position that the regulations are necessary for information-gathering to be able to identify abusive related-party basis adjustments. There are, however, changes to the regulations that are intended to address taxpayer concerns:
The final regulations could be overturned under the CRA. Under the CRA, members of Congress may introduce a resolution of disapproval for regulations that were issued within the CRA lookback period, which generally begins on or after 60 working days before the end of a session of Congress and extends through the beginning of the subsequent session of Congress. If a resolution of disapproval is signed into law, the regulation is overturned. The applicable agency is then barred from issuing a rule “substantially in the same form.” Because the final regulations were promulgated during the CRA lookback period, they may be eligible for a resolution of disapproval and could be overturned.
Additionally, affected taxpayers and material advisors may be able to preemptively challenge the final regulations through an APA action in accordance with the Supreme Court’s ruling in CIC Services, LLC v. IRS, 593 U.S. 209 (2021), that regulations prescribing reporting requirements can be challenged pre-enforcement without violating the Tax Anti-Injunction Act and the Declaratory Judgment Act.
The final regulations on partnership related-party basis adjustment transactions impose significant disclosure requirements on both participants and material advisors. While it is possible that the regulations will be challenged — and ultimately overturned — under the CRA, it is crucial for affected parties to understand these requirements and ensure timely compliance to avoid penalties. For further guidance or assistance with specific transactions, please contact our tax team.
This information is provided by Vinson & Elkins LLP for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended, nor should it be construed, as legal advice.
Discover our latest:
Events
Jenny Speck to Speak at Lockton U.S. Energy Risk Summit
Partner Jenny Speck will speak at Lockton’s U.S. Energy Risk Summit on November 12, 2026, in Houston, Texas. The summit …
November 12, 2026
November 12, 2026 • 1-minute read
CLE Events
Sixth Annual Navigating the Annual Meeting and Reporting Season
Join leading practitioners and industry voices for a timely discussion of the legal, regulatory, and governance developments shaping the next proxy season.
November 11, 2026
November 11, 2026 • 2-minute read
Events
Jenny Speck Speaking at 2026 AFCC Global Biobased Economy Conference
Partner Jenny Speck will speak at the 2026 AFCC Global Biobased Economy Conference & Exhibit in a session titled “Tax …
November 3, 2026
November 3, 2026 • 1-minute read
Podcasts
Powering Progress Episode 14 – Environmental Litigation and the New Data Center Playbook
This series has explored the extraordinary investment flowing into data centers and the challenges surrounding power, real estate, financing, and …
October 29, 2026
October 29, 2026 • 14-minute read
Client Alerts
UK Budget 2026: Data Centres and Power Generation
The Chancellor, John Healey, promised to tackle “the big challenges in energy” with a 10 Year Plan. The Government’s headline …
October 28, 2026
October 28, 2026 • 4-minute read
Media Coverage
Stephanie Noble Featured in Energy & Mineral Law Foundation Member Spotlight
Partner Stephanie Noble was featured in the Energy & Mineral Law Foundation (EMLF) Member Spotlight, where she discussed her path …
October 28, 2026
October 28, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins advised GridStor in connection with the financing of White Tank, a 100 MW / 400 MWh stand-alone …
October 28, 2026
October 28, 2026 • 1-minute read
Firm News
Vinson & Elkins Hires Corporate Partner Lisa Morales
Morales is an experienced M&A lawyer who advises major public companies, financial institutions, and private capital clients on strategic transactions. …
October 28, 2026
October 28, 2026 • 2-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins Represents Perella Weinberg Partners as Financial Advisor in EQT Takeover of Qiagen
Vinson & Elkins is representing Perella Weinberg Partners as financial advisor to the Supervisory Board of Qiagen N.V. in connection …
October 22, 2026
October 22, 2026 • 1-minute read
Media Coverage
Jon Solorzano Discusses Declining Proxy Advisor Influence with FT Agenda
Vinson & Elkins Partner Jon Solorzano spoke with FT Agenda about the declining influence of proxy advisors like ISS and …
October 21, 2026
October 21, 2026 • 1-minute read
Articles
Law Is a Practice. So Is Business Development.
Randi Revisore, Lauren Alford, and DeAnna Englezos reflect on two years of success leading BD Lab — Vinson & Elkins’ …
July 14, 2026 • V&E+ | Values
July 14, 2026 • 7-minute read
Articles
Data Center Dealmakers: A New Era of Power and Compute
Vinson & Elkins Partners Creighton Smith and Milam Newby share the story behind a groundbreaking AI infrastructure transaction — and …
June 15, 2026 • V&E+ Ventures
June 15, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Mid-Level Mindset: Empowering Lawyers Through a Pivotal Career Stage
Vinson & Elkins’ inaugural Mid-Level Associate Summit brought lawyers from across the firm to Houston for three days of learning …
March 31, 2026
March 31, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Pro Bono at Vinson & Elkins: Lawyers Changing Lives
Pro Bono Counsel Parker Cragg reflects on a life dedicated to service, returning to Vinson & Elkins, and wisdom he has picked up along the way.
October 20, 2025 • V&E+ Values
October 20, 2025 • 6-minute read
Client Alerts
The Genuine Cup: Soccer Strengthens Our Communities
Vinson & Elkins Chair Keith Fullenweider and Vice Chair Hilary Preston, alongside partners Creighton Smith and Jenny Speck, sit down for conversation on a global soccer tournament, the firm’s support for it, and their experience as spectators and volunteers.
August 27, 2025 • V&E+ Values
August 27, 2025 • 7-minute read
Thoughts or questions? Send us a note, and we’ll connect you with the right person.
our People
Please note that any communication with Vinson & Elkins via e-mail through this website does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with V&E. Please do not send any confidential information. A conflicts-of-interest procedure must be completed by V&E prior to establishment of an attorney-client relationship. When you execute an engagement letter from V&E you will be our client, and you may then exchange information freely with a V&E attorney.
By clicking “Accept,” you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if it is highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.