Events
Jenny Speck to Speak at Lockton U.S. Energy Risk Summit
Partner Jenny Speck will speak at Lockton’s U.S. Energy Risk Summit on November 12, 2026, in Houston, Texas. The summit …
November 12, 2026
November 12, 2026 • 1-minute read
Insight
Client Alerts
V&E Data Privacy Update
By Michael Kurzer, Rajesh Patel, Alexa Chally, Haley Titcomb, Sean Dao, and Christine Croasdaile*
February 5, 2025 • 6-minute read
On January 13, 2025, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (“Texas AG”) filed the first-ever enforcement action under the Texas Data Privacy and Security Act (“TDPSA”) against insurance company Allstate and its subsidiary, Arity (collectively, “Defendants”). The lawsuit alleges that Defendants unlawfully collected, used, and sold geolocation and movement data from Texans’ cellphones in violation of the TDPSA. This landmark action signals the state’s commitment to enforcing the TDPSA, setting a precedent for future regulatory scrutiny. Businesses operating in Texas must exercise caution and ensure compliance with the TDPSA to avoid similar enforcement actions, which could have significant legal, financial, and reputational consequences.
The Texas AG alleges that Defendants secretly harvested sensitive consumer data by embedding a software development kit (“SDK”) into popular third-party mobile apps, including Life360, GasBuddy, Fuel Rewards, and Routely. According to the lawsuit, the SDK enabled continuous tracking of users’ real-time location, movement patterns, and driving behaviors, such as speed, acceleration, and braking, without their knowledge or consent. The Texas AG claims that Defendants aggregated this data into what Arity marketed as the “world’s largest driving behavior database,” purportedly containing information on over 45 million Americans.
The complaint further alleges that Defendants paid app developers millions of dollars to integrate the SDK into their apps and further incentivized them to expand the “driving behavior” database through bonuses. Once collected, the data was used by Allstate to underwrite its insurance policies and was further monetized via sale of the data to other insurance carriers. According to the lawsuit, insurance carriers used the data to assess driver risk profiles, adjust premiums, and, in some cases, deny or drop coverage. The Texas AG also asserts that the data was misleadingly marketed as “driving behavior” information, despite being based primarily on phone movement, which could mischaracterize passengers in cars or even individuals on amusement park rides as reckless drivers. The lawsuit contends that these practices violate multiple Texas laws, including the TDPSA, the Texas Data Broker Law,1 and the Texas Insurance Code.
Businesses that rely on consumer data for targeted advertising, risk assessments, or analytics may be most impacted by this enforcement action and should focus on the following compliance risks:
1. Increased scrutiny of consumer privacy notices
The Texas AG alleges that Defendants violated the TDPSA by failing to offer a clear and accessible privacy notice informing consumers that their geolocation and movement data were being collected. Businesses must ensure that their privacy policies explicitly disclose what data is being collected, for what purposes, and with whom it is shared. Failure to do so may not only violate the TDPSA but also invite regulatory action for deceptive trade practices.
2. Stricter enforcement of geolocation data collection
The Texas AG also alleges that the companies violated the TDPSA by failing to receive consumers’ affirmative consent to process their precise geolocation information. Any company collecting location data, whether through mobile apps, tracking technologies, or third-party data partnerships, must obtain explicit opt-in consent from consumers before processing such information. Businesses should also implement safeguards to ensure that any location data shared with third parties complies with these privacy regulations.
3. Mandatory disclosure of sensitive data sales
The complaint asserts that Defendants failed to include the legally required notice stating:
“NOTICE: We may sell your sensitive personal data.”
Under the TDPSA, businesses that sell sensitive consumer data must provide this notice clearly and prominently in their privacy policies and any relevant consumer disclosures. Companies engaging in data monetization, analytics, or advertising practices should review their public-facing privacy policies and data-sharing agreements to ensure compliance with the notice requirement.
4. The requirement for opt-out mechanisms
Lastly, the Texas AG’s lawsuit alleges that Defendants violated consumer rights under the TDPSA by failing to provide a mechanism to opt out of data sales or targeted advertising. Businesses that engage in targeted advertising, data-sharing partnerships, or behavioral tracking must implement easy-to-use opt-out mechanisms, such as a clear and visible opt-out link on websites and mobile apps.
While the complaint focuses on businesses involved in the collection, processing, or monetization of consumer data, particularly those that track, analyze, and sell geolocation or behavioral data without proper notice or consent, the TDPSA applies broadly to both individuals and businesses engaging in data collection and processing activities in Texas. Specifically, it applies to any person that (i) conducts business in the state of Texas or produces a product or service consumed by Texas residents, (ii) processes or engages in the sale of personal data, and (iii) is not a small business, as defined by the U.S. Small Business Administration.2
This broad criteria means that many companies, even those based outside of Texas, may need to comply with the TDPSA if they collect or process personal data from Texas residents. However, the following types of entities are explicitly exempt from compliance3:
It is important for all businesses operating in Texas or selling products or services to Texas residents to review their potential obligations under the TDPSA. Any business that is subject to the TDPSA should:
The Texas AG’s enforcement action against Defendants marks a pivotal moment in the application of the TDPSA, setting a strong precedent for how the Texas AG’s office will scrutinize businesses handling consumer data in Texas. This case underscores the importance of compliance for any organization that processes personal data, particularly in industries that rely on data-driven decision-making, such as insurance and technology. With Texas actively enforcing its privacy laws, businesses should take proactive steps to assess their data practices, update privacy policies, and strengthen security measures.
As more states enact comprehensive data privacy laws, businesses must recognize that compliance with one state’s regulations does not guarantee compliance with another. As of the date of publication, twenty (20) states have passed comprehensive data privacy laws, all of which impose unique obligations, including varying definitions of personal data, consent requirements, and enforcement mechanisms. Companies operating across multiple jurisdictions need a comprehensive privacy strategy that accounts for these differences to mitigate risks and prevent costly regulatory penalties.
Given the complexity of the TDPSA and its interplay with other state and federal privacy laws, businesses that are uncertain about their compliance obligations should consult legal counsel. The Vinson & Elkins Technology Transactions team assists clients in identifying, managing, and mitigating cybersecurity and data privacy risks from early planning and assessment to drafting and revising policies and notices to comply with applicable laws, including the TDPSA and other state privacy laws, and managing incident response and resulting investigations and litigation. If you have questions, please contact your V&E attorney.
*Christine Croasdaile is a law clerk in our New York office.
1 Tex. Bus. & Com. Code §§ 509.001–509.009.
2 “Small business” is as defined by the United States Small Business Administration, except as otherwise noted. Small businesses still may not engage in the sale of sensitive personal data without receiving prior consent from the consumer. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code §§ 541.002; 541.107.
3 Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 541.002.
This information is provided by Vinson & Elkins LLP for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended, nor should it be construed, as legal advice.
Discover our latest:
Events
Jenny Speck to Speak at Lockton U.S. Energy Risk Summit
Partner Jenny Speck will speak at Lockton’s U.S. Energy Risk Summit on November 12, 2026, in Houston, Texas. The summit …
November 12, 2026
November 12, 2026 • 1-minute read
CLE Events
Sixth Annual Navigating the Annual Meeting and Reporting Season
Join leading practitioners and industry voices for a timely discussion of the legal, regulatory, and governance developments shaping the next proxy season.
November 11, 2026
November 11, 2026 • 2-minute read
Client Alerts
After the Midterms: Preparing for a New Era of Congressional Oversight
Following the November 2026 midterm elections, Democrats will control both the House and the Senate when the 120th Congress convenes …
November 5, 2026
November 5, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Texas Business Court Quarterly Update – 2026 Q3 Summaries
In the third quarter of 2026, the Texas Business Court continued its progress on an ever-growing docket, issuing a number …
November 4, 2026
November 4, 2026 • 44-minute read
Client Alerts
Fifth Circuit Rejects CFIUS Preemption Challenge to Texas’s Lone Star Infrastructure Protection Act
On October 16, 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued its decision in GH America …
November 3, 2026
November 3, 2026 • 9-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins Advises Underwriters on Enterprise Products’ $1.5 Billion Senior Notes Offering
Vinson and Elkins advised the underwriters in connection with Enterprise Products Operating LLC’s (“EPO”) public offering of $1.5 billion aggregate …
November 6, 2026
November 6, 2026 • 1-minute read
Media Coverage
Aubrey Bishai Explains Responsible Vibe Coding and AI Innovation in Law.com
Vinson & Elkins Chief Innovation Officer Aubrey Bishai was featured in Law.com’s coverage of LegalTech Connect’s 2026 Knowledge Management & …
November 5, 2026
November 5, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins Advises Southern Realty Trust Inc. in Merger with Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
Vinson & Elkins advised Southern Realty Trust Inc. in connection with its entry into a definitive merger agreement with Sunrise …
November 5, 2026
November 5, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins represented Select Water Holdings LLC, a subsidiary of Select Water Solutions, Inc., in connection with a new …
November 4, 2026
November 4, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson and Elkins advised Atlas Energy Solutions ProjectCo, LLC in a $424 million committed senior secured bridge facility with Goldman …
November 3, 2026
November 3, 2026 • 1-minute read
Articles
Innovation and Investment: The Next Frontier in Aerospace and Defense
Vinson & Elkins Partners Sebastian Tiller and Ben Heriaud sit down for a conversation on the firm’s Aerospace and Defense …
November 3, 2026
November 3, 2026 • 6-minute read
Articles
Law Is a Practice. So Is Business Development.
Randi Revisore, Lauren Alford, and DeAnna Englezos reflect on two years of success leading BD Lab — Vinson & Elkins’ …
July 14, 2026 • V&E+ | Values
July 14, 2026 • 7-minute read
Articles
Data Center Dealmakers: A New Era of Power and Compute
Vinson & Elkins Partners Creighton Smith and Milam Newby share the story behind a groundbreaking AI infrastructure transaction — and …
June 15, 2026 • V&E+ Ventures
June 15, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Mid-Level Mindset: Empowering Lawyers Through a Pivotal Career Stage
Vinson & Elkins’ inaugural Mid-Level Associate Summit brought lawyers from across the firm to Houston for three days of learning …
March 31, 2026
March 31, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Pro Bono at Vinson & Elkins: Lawyers Changing Lives
Pro Bono Counsel Parker Cragg reflects on a life dedicated to service, returning to Vinson & Elkins, and wisdom he has picked up along the way.
October 20, 2025 • V&E+ Values
October 20, 2025 • 6-minute read
Thoughts or questions? Send us a note, and we’ll connect you with the right person.
our People
Please note that any communication with Vinson & Elkins via e-mail through this website does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with V&E. Please do not send any confidential information. A conflicts-of-interest procedure must be completed by V&E prior to establishment of an attorney-client relationship. When you execute an engagement letter from V&E you will be our client, and you may then exchange information freely with a V&E attorney.
By clicking “Accept,” you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if it is highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.