Events
Jenny Speck to Speak on BARBRI Webinar
Partner Jenny Speck will speak on BARBRI’s live video CLE program, “Tax Credit Insurance for Energy Projects: PFE Exclusions, Recapture, …
November 19, 2026
November 19, 2026 • 1-minute read
Insight
Client Alerts
V&E Environmental Update
November 17, 2025 • 2-minute read
November 19, 2025 Update
On November 18, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit published an order partially enjoining the California Climate Laws. The Ninth Circuit’s order preliminarily enjoins enforcement of SB 261, but not SB 253. SB 261 reports were required to be published by January 1, 2026, while SB 253 reports are not due util mid-2026 (August 10, 2026, per the California Air Resources Board’s public workshop on the California Climate Laws, which also occurred yesterday).
The partial injunction provides the Ninth Circuit some time to consider the pending appeal before it; namely, the denial by the District Court for the Central District of California of a request for a preliminary injunction. Oral argument on the appeal is currently scheduled for January 2026.
With the deadline to publish SB 261-compliant climate risk reports rapidly approaching (January 1, 2026), and with legal challenges slowly moving through the court system in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California and the Ninth Circuit, it perhaps comes as little surprise that industry groups have now sought the emergency involvement of the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”). On November 14, 2026, several groups — including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce — filed an emergency request with the high court to block both SB 253 (the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act) and SB 261 (the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act) (“California Climate Laws”). The emergency application seeks an injunction prohibiting enforcement of the California Climate Laws pending resolution of the appeal of the denial of a preliminary injunction in the Ninth Circuit. More on the background and the impending deadlines on the laws can be found here and here.
The appellants in the emergency application to SCOTUS argue that the California Climate Laws violate the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by compelling companies to speak on unsettled and controversial climate issues (and, resultingly, pressuring them to alter their behavior). Appellants assert that relief from SCOTUS is now their only recourse and they amply satisfy the standard for an injunction — they are likely to succeed on the merits, the balance of equities is in their favor, and the loss of their First Amendment rights is irreparable (i.e., the speech cannot be undone once compelled). Additionally, there is, appellants argue, no evidence of any urgent need for the California Climate Laws, pointing to California’s own delays and missed deadlines for the implementation of the laws.
At this time, it is not clear whether SCOTUS will grant the industry groups’ request. However, with the compliance deadline of January 1, 2026, for SB 261 reports less than eight weeks away, companies subject to SB 261 should continue their reporting preparations. SB 253 compliance is expected to be due in the summer of 2026.
V&E is closely monitoring developments related to the California climate disclosure laws and other related climate-related disclosure laws. Please reach out to your V&E team to discuss these matters and their implications for your business.
This information is provided by Vinson & Elkins LLP for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended, nor should it be construed, as legal advice.
Discover our latest:
Events
Jenny Speck to Speak on BARBRI Webinar
Partner Jenny Speck will speak on BARBRI’s live video CLE program, “Tax Credit Insurance for Energy Projects: PFE Exclusions, Recapture, …
November 19, 2026
November 19, 2026 • 1-minute read
Events
Kathy Pakenham and Adriana Wirtz to Speak at TEI’s IRS Roundtable
Partners Kathy Pakenham and Adriana Wirtz will examine how a leaner, more data-driven IRS is selecting and conducting large business …
November 19, 2026
November 19, 2026 • 1-minute read
Events
Jenny Speck to Speak at Lockton U.S. Energy Risk Summit
Partner Jenny Speck will speak at Lockton’s U.S. Energy Risk Summit on November 12, 2026, in Houston, Texas. The summit …
November 12, 2026
November 12, 2026 • 1-minute read
Articles
Increasingly construction, engineering, and energy projects in Japan are being procured and managed under international-style contract forms — documents historically …
November 11, 2026
November 11, 2026 • 1-minute read
CLE Events
Sixth Annual Navigating the Annual Meeting and Reporting Season
Join leading practitioners and industry voices for a timely discussion of the legal, regulatory, and governance developments shaping the next proxy season.
November 11, 2026
November 11, 2026 • 2-minute read
Media Coverage
Vinson & Elkins Partner Joyce Adetutu joined CorpGov on the inaugural episode of Beyond the Boardroom, a new series co-produced …
November 9, 2026
November 9, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins Advises Underwriters on Enterprise Products’ $1.5 Billion Senior Notes Offering
Vinson and Elkins advised the underwriters in connection with Enterprise Products Operating LLC’s (“EPO”) public offering of $1.5 billion aggregate …
November 6, 2026
November 6, 2026 • 1-minute read
Media Coverage
Aubrey Bishai Explains Responsible Vibe Coding and AI Innovation in Law.com
Vinson & Elkins Chief Innovation Officer Aubrey Bishai was featured in Law.com’s coverage of LegalTech Connect’s 2026 Knowledge Management & …
November 5, 2026
November 5, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins Advises Southern Realty Trust Inc. in Merger with Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
Vinson & Elkins advised Southern Realty Trust Inc. in connection with its entry into a definitive merger agreement with Sunrise …
November 5, 2026
November 5, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins represented Select Water Holdings LLC, a subsidiary of Select Water Solutions, Inc., in connection with a new …
November 4, 2026
November 4, 2026 • 1-minute read
Articles
Innovation and Investment: The Next Frontier in Aerospace and Defense
Vinson & Elkins Partners Sebastian Tiller and Ben Heriaud sit down for a conversation on the firm’s Aerospace and Defense …
November 3, 2026
November 3, 2026 • 6-minute read
Articles
Law Is a Practice. So Is Business Development.
Randi Revisore, Lauren Alford, and DeAnna Englezos reflect on two years of success leading BD Lab — Vinson & Elkins’ …
July 14, 2026 • V&E+ | Values
July 14, 2026 • 7-minute read
Articles
Data Center Dealmakers: A New Era of Power and Compute
Vinson & Elkins Partners Creighton Smith and Milam Newby share the story behind a groundbreaking AI infrastructure transaction — and …
June 15, 2026 • V&E+ Ventures
June 15, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Mid-Level Mindset: Empowering Lawyers Through a Pivotal Career Stage
Vinson & Elkins’ inaugural Mid-Level Associate Summit brought lawyers from across the firm to Houston for three days of learning …
March 31, 2026
March 31, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Pro Bono at Vinson & Elkins: Lawyers Changing Lives
Pro Bono Counsel Parker Cragg reflects on a life dedicated to service, returning to Vinson & Elkins, and wisdom he has picked up along the way.
October 20, 2025 • V&E+ Values
October 20, 2025 • 6-minute read
Thoughts or questions? Send us a note, and we’ll connect you with the right person.
our People
Please note that any communication with Vinson & Elkins via e-mail through this website does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with V&E. Please do not send any confidential information. A conflicts-of-interest procedure must be completed by V&E prior to establishment of an attorney-client relationship. When you execute an engagement letter from V&E you will be our client, and you may then exchange information freely with a V&E attorney.
By clicking “Accept,” you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if it is highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.