Insight

Litigating Tariff Refund Pass-On Class Actions: Lessons from Antitrust

Articles

Downstream purchasers—distributors, retailers, or end consumers—are now asking if they can claim a share of about $170 billion in potential refunds after the US Supreme Court’s landmark decision invalidating tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

The Supreme Court held Feb. 20 that the statute doesn’t authorize tariffs—a revenue-raising measure historically within the province of Congress under the Import Clause and the Taxing and Spending Clause.

The decision had immediate practical consequences. US Customs and Border Protection had collected billions of dollars in tariffs before the ruling, yet the Supreme Court didn’t prescribe a specific remedy or direct refunds of tariffs already paid. Importers of record moved swiftly to recover, pursuing administrative relief from CBP and filing suit in the US Court of International Trade.

So can downstream purchasers share in those refunds on the theory that the importer of record passed on some or all of the tariff costs through higher prices? Drawing on decades of antitrust jurisprudence—principally the Supreme Court’s decisions in Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp and Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois—we explain why importers of record should retain any tariff refunds and why downstream parties face formidable legal and practical barriers to recovery.

Read the full Bloomberg Law article here.


This information is provided by Vinson & Elkins LLP for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended, nor should it be construed, as legal advice.

Discover our latest:

Insights

CLE Events

Sixth Annual Navigating the Annual Meeting and Reporting Season 

Join leading practitioners and industry voices for a timely discussion of the legal, regulatory, and governance developments shaping the next proxy season.

November 11, 2026

November 11, 2026 • 1-minute read

Navigating Series Background Decorative Image

Events

David Strong Speaking at PLI Tax Strategies Conference in New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles

Partner David Strong will present on “Section 1202 Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS)” at PLI’s Tax Strategies for Corporate Acquisitions, …

Multiple Dates

Multiple Dates • 1-minute read

Events

Vinson & Elkins Sponsoring and Speaking at TEI Annual Conference

Vinson & Elkins is a platinum sponsor of the 2026 TEI Annual Conference, taking place October 18–21 in Nashville, Tennessee. …

October 18–21, 2026

October 18–21, 2026 • 1-minute read

Events

Jenny Speck to Speak at 18th Annual OPIS RFS, RINs & Biofuels Forum

Partner Jenny Speck will speak on the panel “Credit Where Credit is Due: Finalizing 45Z” at the 18th Annual OPIS …

October 13, 2026

October 13, 2026 • 1-minute read

Client Alerts

DOJ’s New Fraud Division Releases New Directive Targeting Health Care, Defense, Tax, Trade, and Fraud on Government Programs

On October 1, 2026, the Department of Justice’s (“DOJ” or the “Department”) new National Fraud Enforcement Division (“NFED” or the …

October 8, 2026

October 8, 2026 • 6-minute read

News & Achievements
V&E

Get in Touch

Thoughts or questions? Send us a note, and we’ll connect you with the right person.

The ESG GC: How Your Role as Chief Legal Officer is Integral To Your Company’s ESG Efforts Background Image