Skip to content
Stephen M. Medlock
Stephen M. Medlock
Partner — Antitrust
Partner — Antitrust

Stephen M. Medlock

Stephen M. Medlock
Washington

2200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Suite 500 West
Washington, DC 20037

start quote symbolI take pride in efficiently resolving my clients' highest stakes and most complex antitrust matters. I learn my clients' business inside and out so that I can find the solutions that others don't see.end quote symbol
Stephen M. Medlock

Experience Highlights

  • Representing United States Steel Corporation in litigation alleging that major domestic steel companies conspired to boycott sales of steel slab to a competitor

  • Representing an elite college in class action alleging that highly-selective universities conspired to limit need-based financial aid paid to admitted undergraduate students

  • Representing multiple Delta Dental companies in connection with a series of consolidated class actions alleging that Delta Dental member companies underpaid dental providers

  • Representing Foster Farms in multiple antirust class actions alleging that poultry companies conspired to cut the supply of broiler chickens and turkeys and suppress compensation paid to poultry industry employees

  • Obtained summary judgment and complete appellate victory in In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litigation, 801 F.3d 383 (3d Cir. 2015) and Sterling Merchandising, Inc. v. Nestle S.A., 656 F.3d 112 (1st Cir. 2011)

  • Obtained dismissal of claims against multinational energy corporation direct-action cases, and state attorney general cases alleging that it engaged with other defendants in a decade-long conspiracy to bribe Venezuelan officials and rig bids for the sale and purchase of crude oil submitted to PDVSA, allegedly costing PDVSA billions of dollars in lost revenue; the trust was purportedly assigned the claims of PDVSA and the Venezuelan government so that it could litigate on PDVSA’s behalf in the U.S. courts

  • Representing corporate client in an ongoing antitrust grand jury investigation

  • Representing corporate clients in response to civil investigative demands served by U.S. Department of Justice and state attorneys general

  • Represented multiple executives alleged to have conspired abroad to fix the prices of automotive parts destined for the US market

Credentials

  • American University Washington College of Law, JD, cum laude, Mooer’s Trophy for Outstanding Student in Trial Advocacy; Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy (2007-2008), 2009
  • Georgetown University, BSFS, International Politics, 2006
  • Co-Chair, Exemptions & Immunities Committee, America Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law
  • District of Columbia
  • Virginia
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
  • English
  • Russian
  • “Chicken Cos. Say Class Treatment Improper In Price-Fix Fight,” Law360, May 10, 2022
  • “Judge says ‘metering’ of asylum applicants at border is illegal,” Reuters, September 3, 2021
  • “‘Turnback’ Asylum Policy Defies 5th Amendment, Judge Says,” Law360, September 2, 2021
  • “Judge Doubts DHS Asylum Stats Disprove ‘Turnback’ Policy,” Law360, August 31, 2021
  • “Judge weighs international implications to Trump-era metering of asylum seekers,” Courthouse News Service, August 31, 2021
  • “DHS Sanctioned Over Border Officers’ Note-Shredding,” Law360, March 30, 2021
  • “A Border Officer Said They Were Told To Lie About Not Having Enough Space To Process Asylum-Seekers,” BuzzFeed News, February 14, 2020
  • “TC Heartland Opens The Door To New Antitrust Claims In Del.,” Law360, June 2, 2017
  • “Auto Dealer Robinson-Patman Act Cases After Stevens Creek,” Law360, December 14, 2016
  • “8 Thoughts On Cartel Investigations Post-Yates Memo,” Law360, March 15, 2016
  • “7th Circ. LCD Antitrust Case: Foreign Vs. US Interests,” Law360, October 30, 2014