Events
Jenny Speck to Speak on BARBRI Webinar
Partner Jenny Speck will speak on BARBRI’s live video CLE program, “Tax Credit Insurance for Energy Projects: PFE Exclusions, Recapture, …
November 19, 2026
November 19, 2026 • 1-minute read
Insight
Client Alerts
V&E Energy Update
By Mike Tomsu, Winston Skinner, and Kris Hildebrand
April 21, 2025 • 5-minute read
The Texas Legislature has been debating several bills aimed at boosting dispatchable power in ERCOT while erecting new economic and permitting barriers for renewables. Texas lawmakers have expressed their growing concerns about the threat to grid reliability posed by the proliferation of intermittent renewable generation, the explosion of large load requests from hyperscale data centers, and the threat to grid security posed by foreign control of electric infrastructure. Three key bills making progress through the Legislature are worth watching closely because of their potential impact on both existing and new renewable energy projects: Senate Bills (SB) 388, 715, and 819. Below we provide an overview of key features in these bills.
SB 388 sets an ambitious goal for new dispatchable generation. If signed into law, the bill would push for 50% of the generating capacity installed in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) region after January 1, 2026, to be sourced from dispatchable generation. To achieve this, the bill would direct the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) to create a new dispatchable generation credits trading program and set dispatchable generation requirements for power generation owners if this threshold is not organically met through ERCOT’s generation interconnection queue. For each power generation company (PGC), municipally owned utility, and electric cooperative in ERCOT, these requirements could be met with each entity’s own dispatchable generation and/or with acquired credits. Interestingly, battery energy storage systems (BESS) are treated neutrally under the program: Generators that only operate BESS assets would neither receive nor need to acquire dispatchable credits under the program. While the bill does not explicitly make the dispatchable credits program applicable only to new generation or to existing generators, the bill appears more likely intended to cover both.
Program Activation and PUCT Rulemaking
The bill requires the PUCT to activate the new program on or before January 1, 2027, if it determines that dispatchable generation will make up less than 55% of all new generation capacity installed in ERCOT after January 1, 2026. Today, less than 10% of generation in the ERCOT interconnection queue is dispatchable (excluding BESS), so it is very likely that the program would be activated.
Within 180 days of activation, the bill requires the PUCT to create compliance rules and penalties. It must calculate dispatchable generation requirements for each entity subject to the program in a manner reasonably calculated to produce compliance with the 50% goal. Each entity subject to the program can fulfill its requirement by owning or purchasing rights to dispatchable capacity, or by purchasing dispatchable credits.
Credit Generation and Program Administration
Under the new bill, each megawatt of installed dispatchable generation capacity energized after January 1, 2026, is eligible to generate one dispatchable generation credit. (New nuclear projects would effectively receive double credits.) To promote reliability, the bill directs the PUCT to create performance standards that new dispatchable generation must comply with to generate credits.
ERCOT would administer the new program. It must create a tracking system to award dispatchable generation credits to new dispatchable generation facilities that meet eligibility requirements. Before September 15 of each year, ERCOT must file a report with the PUCT indicating whether the 50% goal was met in the prior year.
Before January 15 of each year, the PUCT must notify each relevant entity of its credit requirement for the previous year. Each relevant entity must meet their credit requirement by acquiring and retiring sufficient credits by an annual deadline to be set by the PUCT.
Current Status
SB 388 passed the Texas Senate on March 19 and awaits action in the Texas House.
SB 819 would create a siting regime for most new or expanded solar and wind projects. The permitting statute would require a solar or wind developer to apply for a permit by sharing facility information, providing notice, hosting a public meeting, and facilitating an environmental impact review. While the version of SB 819 that passed the Senate scaled back some of the more rigorous requirements, it would still represent a significant change to renewables development.
When a Permit is Required
A person must apply for and receive a permit before interconnection to the ERCOT transmission grid of a renewable generation facility with a capacity of 10 MW or greater. The requirement does not apply to solar facilities inside a home-rule municipality’s corporate limits.
Application Contents
The bill directs the PUCT to create a new permit application that would require an applicant to provide the location and type of facility, copies of any FERC registrations, applicant information, a facility agreement under Tex. Util. Code chapter 301 or 302, documentation of local governmental support or opposition, the facility’s effect on national security, information related to other state authorizations issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality or Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, and any other information required by the PUCT. Applicants may also provide an environmental impact statement or fire mitigation plan.
Notice Requirements
An applicant must provide notice to the county judge of each county within 25 miles of the proposed facility and publish two notices in a local newspaper.
Setback Requirement
Originally, the introduced version of the bill required wind equipment to be located at least 3,000 feet from any property line, unless each affected person provides a written waiver, but Senate floor amendments reduced this setback requirement to twice the height of the wind turbine (inclusive of blade length). Solar equipment must be located at least 100 feet from any property line and 200 feet from any habitable structure, unless each affected person provides a written waiver. The bill allows the PUCT to require greater setback distances as a condition of approval.
Application Approval or Denial
The PUCT must approve or deny an application within 180 days, subject to an extension up to 30 days, or else it is considered approved. The PUCT can only deny an application if it finds that the new facility’s potential harm substantially outweighs the potential benefits to the state, or the application otherwise does not meet the statute’s requirements. The PUCT must explain any denial and give the applicant an opportunity to file an amended application.
Current Status
SB 819 passed the Texas Senate on April 15 and awaits action in the Texas House.
SB 715 adjusts the implementation of the generation reliability requirements of Tex. Util. Code Section 39.1592 added by H.B. 1500 in 2023. Current law would require new generators that sign standard generator interconnection agreements on or after January 1, 2027, to demonstrate availability to dispatch when called upon at or above the seasonal average capability during the lowest operating reserve hours, taking into account maintenance, unrelated outages, and daily ramping periods. Generators that do not meet the reliability requirements could contract with other resources, including BESS, for supplemental power. It also empowers the PUCT and ERCOT to create a program of financial incentives and penalties for exceeding or failing to meet reliability requirements.
SB 715 would make these requirements subject to sooner phase-in at the PUCT’s discretion. A substitute version, which passed the Senate Business and Commerce Committee on April 15, has not been publicly posted on the Legislature’s website as of noon on Sunday, April 20. However, the Senate committee hearing discussion noted the substitute bill would exempt facilities that can continuously dispatch for 24 hours or that sufficiently contract with BESS or backup power sources. The committee debate about the substitute version also described removal of specific implementation dates that were present in the filed version, giving the PUCT more flexibility both in adopting and enforcing its provisions.
Current Status
The committee substitute version of SB 715 passed the Senate Business and Commerce Committee and is pending with the full Senate. A companion bill, HB 3356, containing identical language to the initially filed version of SB 715, has also been debated and remains pending in the Texas House State Affairs Committee.
As the Legislature continues to evaluate how renewables factor into reliably meeting Texas’ explosive load growth, it is not too late for project owners to contact their representatives, especially in the Texas House, to make their voices heard. By engaging with relevant stakeholders before policies get finalized, developers will put themselves in the best position to influence the debate. And once the Legislative session ends on June 2, focus will shift to the inevitable PUCT rulemakings necessary to implement whatever policy choices the Legislature and Governor Abbott choose to enact. We have deep experience in assisting with energy policy advocacy before the Legislature and the PUCT.
This information is provided by Vinson & Elkins LLP for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended, nor should it be construed, as legal advice.
Discover our latest:
Events
Jenny Speck to Speak on BARBRI Webinar
Partner Jenny Speck will speak on BARBRI’s live video CLE program, “Tax Credit Insurance for Energy Projects: PFE Exclusions, Recapture, …
November 19, 2026
November 19, 2026 • 1-minute read
Events
Kathy Pakenham and Adriana Wirtz to Speak at TEI’s IRS Roundtable
Partners Kathy Pakenham and Adriana Wirtz will examine how a leaner, more data-driven IRS is selecting and conducting large business …
November 19, 2026
November 19, 2026 • 1-minute read
Client Alerts
Single v Multi Contracts in Nuclear Projects: The Size of the Burden
Introduction The construction of nuclear energy projects is complex and capital-intensive, and the contracting structure can significantly affect project delivery, …
November 13, 2026
November 13, 2026 • 6-minute read
Articles
State Attorneys General Widen the Antitrust Battlefield
State attorneys general are moving to the center of antitrust enforcement, with bipartisan coalitions attacking merger settlements, information-sharing arrangements, labor-market …
November 13, 2026
November 13, 2026 • 4-minute read
Events
Jenny Speck to Speak at Lockton U.S. Energy Risk Summit
Partner Jenny Speck will speak at Lockton’s U.S. Energy Risk Summit on November 12, 2026, in Houston, Texas. The summit …
November 12, 2026
November 12, 2026 • 1-minute read
Media Coverage
Vinson & Elkins Partner Joyce Adetutu joined CorpGov on the inaugural episode of Beyond the Boardroom, a new series co-produced …
November 9, 2026
November 9, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins Advises Underwriters on Enterprise Products’ $1.5 Billion Senior Notes Offering
Vinson and Elkins advised the underwriters in connection with Enterprise Products Operating LLC’s (“EPO”) public offering of $1.5 billion aggregate …
November 6, 2026
November 6, 2026 • 1-minute read
Media Coverage
Aubrey Bishai Explains Responsible Vibe Coding and AI Innovation in Law.com
Vinson & Elkins Chief Innovation Officer Aubrey Bishai was featured in Law.com’s coverage of LegalTech Connect’s 2026 Knowledge Management & …
November 5, 2026
November 5, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins Advises Southern Realty Trust Inc. in Merger with Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
Vinson & Elkins advised Southern Realty Trust Inc. in connection with its entry into a definitive merger agreement with Sunrise …
November 5, 2026
November 5, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins represented Select Water Holdings LLC, a subsidiary of Select Water Solutions, Inc., in connection with a new …
November 4, 2026
November 4, 2026 • 1-minute read
Articles
Innovation and Investment: The Next Frontier in Aerospace and Defense
Vinson & Elkins Partners Sebastian Tiller and Ben Heriaud sit down for a conversation on the firm’s Aerospace and Defense …
November 3, 2026
November 3, 2026 • 6-minute read
Articles
Law Is a Practice. So Is Business Development.
Randi Revisore, Lauren Alford, and DeAnna Englezos reflect on two years of success leading BD Lab — Vinson & Elkins’ …
July 14, 2026 • V&E+ | Values
July 14, 2026 • 7-minute read
Articles
Data Center Dealmakers: A New Era of Power and Compute
Vinson & Elkins Partners Creighton Smith and Milam Newby share the story behind a groundbreaking AI infrastructure transaction — and …
June 15, 2026 • V&E+ Ventures
June 15, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Mid-Level Mindset: Empowering Lawyers Through a Pivotal Career Stage
Vinson & Elkins’ inaugural Mid-Level Associate Summit brought lawyers from across the firm to Houston for three days of learning …
March 31, 2026
March 31, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Pro Bono at Vinson & Elkins: Lawyers Changing Lives
Pro Bono Counsel Parker Cragg reflects on a life dedicated to service, returning to Vinson & Elkins, and wisdom he has picked up along the way.
October 20, 2025 • V&E+ Values
October 20, 2025 • 6-minute read
Thoughts or questions? Send us a note, and we’ll connect you with the right person.
our People
Please note that any communication with Vinson & Elkins via e-mail through this website does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with V&E. Please do not send any confidential information. A conflicts-of-interest procedure must be completed by V&E prior to establishment of an attorney-client relationship. When you execute an engagement letter from V&E you will be our client, and you may then exchange information freely with a V&E attorney.
By clicking “Accept,” you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if it is highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.