Events
Jenny Speck to Speak on BARBRI Webinar
Partner Jenny Speck will speak on BARBRI’s live video CLE program, “Tax Credit Insurance for Energy Projects: PFE Exclusions, Recapture, …
November 19, 2026
November 19, 2026 • 1-minute read
Insight
Client Alerts
V&E Governance & Sustainability Update
March 28, 2025 • 2-minute read
In a move that perhaps comes as no surprise, on March 27, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “the Commission”) issued Press Release 2025-58 announcing it had voted to end its defense of its climate-related disclosures rules (The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors). The announcement comes on the heels of SEC Acting Chairman Mark T. Uyeda’s statement on February 11, 2025, where he requested the Eighth Circuit hold off scheduling oral argument in the consolidated appeals challenging the rules in order to allow the Commission “to deliberate and determine the appropriate next steps.” The SEC’s decision to abandon its defense of the rules, paired with the ongoing stay of those rules pending judicial review, means that the rules are not, and likely will never be, effective.
The SEC finalized the climate-related disclosures rules in March 2024, and they were immediately challenged. Shortly thereafter, the Commission chose to administratively stay the effectiveness of the rules pending completion of the various challenges against them. With the change in presidential administrations, and the stepping down of former SEC Chairman Gary Gensler in January 2025, it was anticipated that the Commission would repeal, revoke, or amend the rules.
SEC Acting Chairman Uyeda opposed the adoption of the rules alongside Commissioner Hester Peirce, noting that the SEC is “without statutory authority or expertise” to address climate change issues. Following the vote yesterday, the SEC sent a letter to the Eighth Circuit withdrawing both its defense of the rules and authorization of its counsel to advance the arguments in the brief the Commission had filed in the case (completed before the change in presidential administrations). The Commission explained that the Eighth Circuit “would not need to reach the petitioners’ challenges based on the First Amendment or non-delegation doctrine if [the court] sets the [r]ules aside on other grounds.” The SEC yielded any oral argument time back to the Court. SEC Acting Chairman Uyeda, in comments accompanying Press Release 2025-58, noted that the rules were both “costly” and “unnecessarily intrusive.” Per the letter to the Eighth Circuit, “a majority of the current Commissioners voted against the rules.”
Although the SEC’s climate-related disclosures rules are no more, companies may still be subject to other disclosure regimes. For example, those companies with global operations and/or a presence in Europe will be subject to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, although admittedly a pared-back version following the recently proposed Omnibus Package to simplify and delay the reporting requirements. And, for those companies that “do business” in California, they may still be subject to the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act and the Climate-related Financial Risk Act pending the outcome of litigation there.
We will continue monitoring such developments regarding climate-related disclosure requirements. Please reach out to your Vinson & Elkins team to discuss these matters further and the potential implications on your business.
This information is provided by Vinson & Elkins LLP for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended, nor should it be construed, as legal advice.
Discover our latest:
Events
Jenny Speck to Speak on BARBRI Webinar
Partner Jenny Speck will speak on BARBRI’s live video CLE program, “Tax Credit Insurance for Energy Projects: PFE Exclusions, Recapture, …
November 19, 2026
November 19, 2026 • 1-minute read
Events
Kathy Pakenham and Adriana Wirtz to Speak at TEI’s IRS Roundtable
Partners Kathy Pakenham and Adriana Wirtz will examine how a leaner, more data-driven IRS is selecting and conducting large business …
November 19, 2026
November 19, 2026 • 1-minute read
Client Alerts
Single v Multi Contracts in Nuclear Projects: The Size of the Burden
Introduction The construction of nuclear energy projects is complex and capital-intensive, and the contracting structure can significantly affect project delivery, …
November 13, 2026
November 13, 2026 • 6-minute read
Articles
State Attorneys General Widen the Antitrust Battlefield
State attorneys general are moving to the center of antitrust enforcement, with bipartisan coalitions attacking merger settlements, information-sharing arrangements, labor-market …
November 13, 2026
November 13, 2026 • 4-minute read
Events
Jenny Speck to Speak at Lockton U.S. Energy Risk Summit
Partner Jenny Speck will speak at Lockton’s U.S. Energy Risk Summit on November 12, 2026, in Houston, Texas. The summit …
November 12, 2026
November 12, 2026 • 1-minute read
Media Coverage
Vinson & Elkins Partner Joyce Adetutu joined CorpGov on the inaugural episode of Beyond the Boardroom, a new series co-produced …
November 9, 2026
November 9, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins Advises Underwriters on Enterprise Products’ $1.5 Billion Senior Notes Offering
Vinson and Elkins advised the underwriters in connection with Enterprise Products Operating LLC’s (“EPO”) public offering of $1.5 billion aggregate …
November 6, 2026
November 6, 2026 • 1-minute read
Media Coverage
Aubrey Bishai Explains Responsible Vibe Coding and AI Innovation in Law.com
Vinson & Elkins Chief Innovation Officer Aubrey Bishai was featured in Law.com’s coverage of LegalTech Connect’s 2026 Knowledge Management & …
November 5, 2026
November 5, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins Advises Southern Realty Trust Inc. in Merger with Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
Vinson & Elkins advised Southern Realty Trust Inc. in connection with its entry into a definitive merger agreement with Sunrise …
November 5, 2026
November 5, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins represented Select Water Holdings LLC, a subsidiary of Select Water Solutions, Inc., in connection with a new …
November 4, 2026
November 4, 2026 • 1-minute read
Articles
Innovation and Investment: The Next Frontier in Aerospace and Defense
Vinson & Elkins Partners Sebastian Tiller and Ben Heriaud sit down for a conversation on the firm’s Aerospace and Defense …
November 3, 2026
November 3, 2026 • 6-minute read
Articles
Law Is a Practice. So Is Business Development.
Randi Revisore, Lauren Alford, and DeAnna Englezos reflect on two years of success leading BD Lab — Vinson & Elkins’ …
July 14, 2026 • V&E+ | Values
July 14, 2026 • 7-minute read
Articles
Data Center Dealmakers: A New Era of Power and Compute
Vinson & Elkins Partners Creighton Smith and Milam Newby share the story behind a groundbreaking AI infrastructure transaction — and …
June 15, 2026 • V&E+ Ventures
June 15, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Mid-Level Mindset: Empowering Lawyers Through a Pivotal Career Stage
Vinson & Elkins’ inaugural Mid-Level Associate Summit brought lawyers from across the firm to Houston for three days of learning …
March 31, 2026
March 31, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Pro Bono at Vinson & Elkins: Lawyers Changing Lives
Pro Bono Counsel Parker Cragg reflects on a life dedicated to service, returning to Vinson & Elkins, and wisdom he has picked up along the way.
October 20, 2025 • V&E+ Values
October 20, 2025 • 6-minute read
Thoughts or questions? Send us a note, and we’ll connect you with the right person.
our People
Please note that any communication with Vinson & Elkins via e-mail through this website does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with V&E. Please do not send any confidential information. A conflicts-of-interest procedure must be completed by V&E prior to establishment of an attorney-client relationship. When you execute an engagement letter from V&E you will be our client, and you may then exchange information freely with a V&E attorney.
By clicking “Accept,” you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if it is highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.