Counsel
Intellectual Property
Jeff counsels and represents companies in all types of Intellectual Property matters, including patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. The majority of his work involves patent litigation and he has extensive experience representing a broad cross-section of companies in the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas and before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Jeff’s technical background is in the field of electrical and computer engineering. Prior to law, Jeff worked for a multidisciplinary research institute developing custom, microelectronic solutions for government and industry clients. As an attorney, Jeff continues to apply his problem solving skills and technical acumen to build case strategies in disputes involving complex technology. Jeff is skilled in quickly assessing patent infringement and validity issues, thoroughly preparing cases for trial, and spotting opportunities for quick resolutions when they arise.
Represented a global leader in solar cell technology in patent infringement litigation regarding innovations in solar panel modules
(W.D. Tex.) Represented leading Measure-While-Drilling technology provider against competitor’s patent infringement claims
(S.D. Tex.) Represented leading independent manufacturer of downhole drilling motor power sections against competitor in trade secret misappropriation case related to elastomer compounds
(E.D. Tex.) Represented Biotechnology company against claims of patent infringement and false advertisement, as well as various Texas state law claims related to the sale of antimicrobial coatings amid the COVID-19 pandemic
(E.D. Tex.) Represented Japanese display manufacturer in multinational competitor case resulting in a favorable settlement
(C.D. Cal.) Obtained order requiring foreign litigant’s U.S. subsidiary to produce documents for use in Chinese proceedings under 28 U.S.C. §1782
(E.D. Tex.) Represented Japanese display manufacturer in patent infringement litigation brought by a non-practicing entity who acquired part of a patent portfolio originally owned by a major handset manufacturer
(E.D. Tex.) Obtained jury verdict of noninfringement for leading smartphone maker in patent litigation involving universal remote control technology
(D. Del.) Achieved early settlement and voluntary dismissal in patent infringement case for a leading computer manufacturer related to audio systems for portable PCs
Education
Admissions
Event Recaps
Data Center Disputes – What We’ve Seen and What is Around the Corner
This presentation surveyed the rapidly expanding landscape of data center disputes, highlighting the breadth of litigation already underway and the emerging risks on the horizon.
July 29, 2026
July 29, 2026 • 1-minute read
Client Alerts
Proposed Cybersecurity Regulation Uncertain Under Trump Administration
Proposed cybersecurity regulation may face changes or challenges in view of the incoming Trump administration that is intent on reducing the perceived regulatory burden on American companies and streamlining government operations. Still, the incoming administration is not likely to dismiss the importance of cybersecurity for the nation, but will aim to balance the need for collaboration and awareness with the reasonable demands on the private sector.
December 5, 2024
December 5, 2024 • 4-minute read
Client Alerts
The Development of AI-Driven E-Discovery Tools
Recent headlines have been dominated by rapid developments in generative artificial intelligence, and a number of startups are positioning themselves to offer new tools to the legal industry making use of this groundbreaking technology.
December 12, 2023
December 12, 2023 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
The Future of Generative AI Discovery Tools
The legal world recently learned an important lesson about the blind adoption of generative AI when two New York attorneys were sanctioned for using ChatGPT to write a brief that included entirely fabricated cases.
December 12, 2023
December 12, 2023 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Stopping Holes in Your IPR Estoppel Arguments
On April 3, 2023, in Ironburg Inventions Ltd. v. Valve Corp., Nos. 21-2296, 21-2297, 22-1070 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2023), the Federal Circuit for the first time defined the standard for determining the scope of estoppel set forth in 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) for prior art that was not raised in an inter partes review (“IPR”) petition.
April 5, 2023 • V&E IP Update
April 5, 2023 • 3-minute read
Awards & Rankings
The Best Lawyers in America (BL Rankings, LLC) has named 125 Vinson & Elkins lawyers in its “Best Lawyers” category in the 2026 edition. Additionally, 76 Vinson & Elkins attorneys have been named in the “Ones to Watch” category, which recognizes lawyers with 5–10 years’ experience. Some individuals are listed in more than one practice area, giving the firm a total of 305 rankings.
August 21, 2025
August 21, 2025 • 3-minute read
Awards & Rankings
The Best Lawyers in America has named 124 Vinson & Elkins lawyers in its “Best Lawyers” category in the 2024 edition. Additionally, 87 Vinson & Elkins attorneys have been named in the Ones to Watch category, which recognizes lawyers with 5-10 years’ experience. Some individuals are listed in more than one practice area, giving the firm a total of 308 rankings.
August 21, 2023
August 21, 2023 • 2-minute read
our People
Please note that any communication with Vinson & Elkins via e-mail through this website does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with V&E. Please do not send any confidential information. A conflicts-of-interest procedure must be completed by V&E prior to establishment of an attorney-client relationship. When you execute an engagement letter from V&E you will be our client, and you may then exchange information freely with a V&E attorney.
By clicking “Accept,” you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if it is highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.
