Client Alerts
Last fall, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) gave project developers a valuable thing in Clean Air Act permitting: a usable …
May 14, 2026
May 14, 2026 • 6-minute read
Senior Partner
Environmental & Natural Resources
“Some days, I’m in federal district court defending enforcement cases, or in dialogue with EPA and DOJ and NGO lawyers to resolve them. Some days, at clients’ operations, working through their permitting strategies in support of development plans, or investigating compliance issues. So I get to do most things lawyers do, but with a focus on obligations imposed by the laws governing air quality.”
Eric Groten is an accomplished Clean Air Act practitioner with nearly 40 years of experience navigating state and federal air quality laws. His work covers the full array of legal work generated by air quality laws, including defending enforcement actions, applying for the permits they require, transacting emissions rights, counseling clients on compliance and lobbying to change rules and the laws themselves. He has represented upstream, midstream and petrochemical facilities, power generators, and extractive industries in enforcement actions brought by EPA, by state agencies and by citizen groups.
Chambers USA described Eric as “a highly experienced air emissions lawyer, distinguished in the market by the sizable volume of contested air permitting work he undertakes,” and “creative in thinking through how to find an interpretation that’s going to get you the result you need” (2019). Indeed, Eric relishes the opportunity to help a client that’s willing to actively defend itself when it believes it has operated within the law. And to find a way through permitting disputes that stand in the way of capital projects that modernize our industrial base.
Counsel to lead petitioner organization in DC Circuit and Supreme Court judicial review proceedings challenging U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initiatives to regulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under the Clean Air Act
Successful contested case prosecution of air permits for various industrial sectors in Texas, including coal- and natural gas-fired power generation, chemical manufacturing, nonferrous smelting, waste disposal, and rock quarrying and crushing
Defended challenges to Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) permitting decisions in Travis County District Court and Texas Court of Appeals related to power plants and other industrial facilities
Defended enforcement actions brought by the TCEQ against many industrial sectors, including upstream, midstream, power generation, and petrochemical facilities
Defended citizen suit brought in Ohio federal district court against gas pipeline company, with mediated resolution
Assisted client in obtaining a Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit for GHG emissions from EPA Region 6 for a proposed 400 MW power project in Texas
Defended EPCRA enforcement actions brought by EPA against a polymer manufacturer and a steel equipment fabricator
Defended allegations of emission limit violations brought against power company in New Mexico District Court
Defended claims brought by State of Ohio in State court alleging violations of nuisance prohibitions and related requirements by client’s compressor station
Defended citizen suit brought against a power company in U.S. District Court alleging noncompliance with MACT requirements, including Fifth Circuit appeal and Supreme Court petition for certiorari
Obtained issuance of PSD permit for hydrogenous fertilizer manufacturing facility in Idaho following contested case
Defended EPA enforcement action against oil terminal operator in California
Defended EPA civil actions alleging violations of fugitive emissions and other requirements applicable to upstream and midstream operations
Defended nationwide enforcement action brought by the EPA to enforce rules governing industrial use of CFCs
Developed permitting strategies to enable cost-effective modernization of a Pennsylvania refinery and conducted negotiations with EPA to implement same
Filed first notices of audit and disclosures under Texas Environmental Health and Safety Audit Privilege Act, and continued active participation in audit programs and policies
Developed legislation authorizing cross-border, cross-pollutant emission trading, as well as the rules to implement the legislation, and then obtained governmental approval of the first trade under those rules
Negotiated first-ever multiparty emissions trades with Area Emission Credit Organization in Texas
Developed and negotiated first-ever single property agreement approved by State of Texas
Negotiated EPA MACT standards for the copper smelting industry
Developed PM-10 SIP for an industrial area in Arizona
Prosecuted property tax use determination for a gas-fired power plant in Texas
Obtained emergency orders authorizing the reconstruction of chemical processes affected by accidental damage
Advised clients on risks associated with environmental issues in M&A transactions
Education
Admissions
Client Alerts
Last fall, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) gave project developers a valuable thing in Clean Air Act permitting: a usable …
May 14, 2026
May 14, 2026 • 6-minute read
Client Alerts
EPA Draws the Line: What Can You Build Before Getting an Air Permit?
What can project developers actually build before securing an air permit?
September 18, 2025 • V&E Environmental Update
September 18, 2025 • 4-minute read
Client Alerts
On June 17, 2025 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) published a proposed rule to repeal the amendments to the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (“MATS”) adopted by the Biden administration in 2024.
June 17, 2025 • V&E Energy Update
June 17, 2025 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Power Move: EPA Proposes GHG Rules Repeal
On June 17, 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) published a proposed rule that, if finalized, would repeal all greenhouse gas (“GHG”) standards for the power sector.
June 17, 2025 • V&E Energy Update
June 17, 2025 • 8-minute read
Event Recaps
Powering Texas: Obtaining and Defending Air Quality Permits
Vinson & Elkins attorneys discussed how to obtain and defend key air quality permits for power plants.
October 15, 2024
October 15, 2024 • 1-minute read
Awards & Rankings
The Legal 500 US 2026 recommended Vinson & Elkins as a leading law firm in 47 practice categories. In total, …
June 10, 2026
June 10, 2026 • 3-minute read
Awards & Rankings
Vinson & Elkins announced today that it achieved 20 Band 1 rankings in Chambers USA 2026: Nationwide: Energy Transition; Energy: …
June 4, 2026
June 4, 2026 • 3-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins Helps Fermi Secure Air Quality Permit for Texas Data Center
Vinson & Elkins advised Fermi Inc., which today announced that the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has granted final approval …
February 25, 2026
February 25, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins advised Pacifico Energy in connection with securing a Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (“TCEQ”) air permit authorizing …
January 29, 2026
January 29, 2026 • 1-minute read
Awards & Rankings
The Best Lawyers in America (BL Rankings, LLC) has named 125 Vinson & Elkins lawyers in its “Best Lawyers” category in the 2026 edition. Additionally, 76 Vinson & Elkins attorneys have been named in the “Ones to Watch” category, which recognizes lawyers with 5–10 years’ experience. Some individuals are listed in more than one practice area, giving the firm a total of 305 rankings.
August 21, 2025
August 21, 2025 • 3-minute read
our People
Please note that any communication with Vinson & Elkins via e-mail through this website does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with V&E. Please do not send any confidential information. A conflicts-of-interest procedure must be completed by V&E prior to establishment of an attorney-client relationship. When you execute an engagement letter from V&E you will be our client, and you may then exchange information freely with a V&E attorney.
By clicking “Accept,” you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if it is highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.