Client Alerts
On September 1, 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its widely anticipated decision in …
September 3, 2026
September 3, 2026 • 8-minute read
Josh is an appellate litigator. His practice involves a wide range of civil and criminal matters in the U.S. Supreme Court and federal and state appellate courts, as well as matters in federal trial courts and regulatory and legal counseling.
In addition to his work at the firm, Josh has significant experience working in the federal government. Most recently, he served as an Assistant General Counsel (a managerial position) within the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Office of Law & Policy. In that position, he advised Bureau leadership on issues of administrative law and federal consumer financial law, with a particular focus on legal issues related to credit reporting and consumer privacy. Earlier in his career, Josh served in the Appellate Section of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Criminal Division, where he participated in briefing cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and argued cases before the U.S. Courts of Appeals.
Josh served as a law clerk at all three levels of the federal court system. He clerked for Judge Nancy Gertner (District of Massachusetts, 2009–2010), Judge David S. Tatel (D.C. Circuit, 2010–2011), and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (U.S. Supreme Court, 2012–2013).
Josh has also served as an instructor for the University of Virginia School of Law’s Supreme Court Litigation Clinic.
(D.C. Cir.) – Represented a major interstate natural gas pipeline company in successfully defending FERC's approval of a $390 million pipeline project and its predetermination that the project's costs may be rolled into system rates in a future rate proceeding
(U.S.) – Briefed and argued case involving the copyrightability of annotations to a state’s official code
(11th Cir.) — Secured affirmance of summary judgment in favor of airline client in putative antitrust class action alleging price-fixing of checked baggage fees
(D.C. Cir.) – Successfully defended award of summary judgment to government contractor in False Claims Act suit
(Fed. Cir.) – Successfully defended judgment favoring government contractor in bid protest
(6th Cir.) – Briefed and argued challenge to a Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration enforcement order against a pipeline operator
(1st Cir.); (D.Mass.) – Secured and successfully defended on appeal district court order holding that Natural Gas Act preempted the application of a municipal ordinance to a federally approved natural gas pipeline compressor station
(1st Cir.) – Successfully defended air permit for natural gas pipeline compressor station against numerous Clean Air Act and state-law challenges; successfully argued against vacatur of permit on one issue where Court concluded additional analysis by state agency was needed, and then successfully defended agency’s reaffirmance of air permit in subsequent post-remand appeal
(2d Cir.) – Drafted briefs in appeal from a criminal conviction in a case involving an alleged violation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, among other charges
(U.S.); (5th Cir.); (W.D. Tex.) – Obtained summary judgment defending the State Bar of Texas against a First Amendment mandatory bar challenge; on appeal, the Fifth Circuit vacated and granted partial summary judgment and a preliminary injunction to the three plaintiffs, but upheld the vast majority of the Bar’s challenged initiatives as constitutional; the U.S. Supreme Court denied our opponents’ cert petition
(Va.) — Drafted and presented oral argument in support of a petition for appeal in a government-contracting dispute involving numerous claims, including defamation and misappropriation of trade secrets
(D.C. Cir.) – Successfully defended the EPA’s decision not to promulgate financial-responsibility regulations for the hardrock mining industry under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(Fed. Cir.) – Won vacatur of Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals’ decision rejecting government contractor’s claims of breach of implied duty of good faith and fair dealing and constructive change
(D.C. Cir.) — Participated in two successful mandamus proceedings challenging district court orders compelling disclosure of privileged documents created in connection with a corporate internal investigation
(2d Cir.) — Won reversal of $35 million antitrust judgment, successfully arguing that client’s alleged tortious conduct in connection with settlement of patent infringement litigation had not harmed competition
(4th Cir.) — Secured affirmance of dismissal of False Claims Act suit
(5th Cir.) — Drafted an amicus brief supporting challengers of an order certifying a RICO class action
(9th Cir.) — Petitioned the Ninth Circuit for review of the EPA’s partial disapproval of Arizona’s regional-haze state implementation plan
(5th Cir.) — Petitioned for review of Board of Immigration Appeals orders
Education
Admissions
Client Alerts
On September 1, 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its widely anticipated decision in …
September 3, 2026
September 3, 2026 • 8-minute read
Client Alerts
California Pipeline Ruling Signals Expansive Defense Production Act Preemption Power
On August 19, 2026, Judge Stephen V. Wilson of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled that a Trump administration order under the Defense Production Act (“DPA”) allows Sable Offshore Corporation to flow oil through its onshore pipeline, despite California’s contention that the pipeline’s operation violates state law.
August 25, 2026
August 25, 2026 • 8-minute read
Client Alerts
In a pair of decisions issued on June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed the constitutional …
July 1, 2026
July 1, 2026 • 9-minute read
Client Alerts
Organizations challenging an agency’s termination of a grant or government contract based on an allegedly illegal government policy need to master a two-step dance, according to a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision.
August 26, 2025 • V&E Supreme Court Update Published by Westlaw Today, Thomson Reuters, October 2025
August 26, 2025 • 10-minute read
Firm News
Appellate Lawyer Joshua Johnson Returns to Vinson & Elkins
Johnson is an accomplished litigator who has served in senior roles in government and private practice, handling appeals in civil and criminal matters.
June 2, 2025
June 2, 2025 • 2-minute read
our People
Please note that any communication with Vinson & Elkins via e-mail through this website does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with V&E. Please do not send any confidential information. A conflicts-of-interest procedure must be completed by V&E prior to establishment of an attorney-client relationship. When you execute an engagement letter from V&E you will be our client, and you may then exchange information freely with a V&E attorney.
By clicking “Accept,” you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if it is highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.