Overview

Josh is an appellate litigator. His practice involves a wide range of civil and criminal matters in the U.S. Supreme Court and federal and state appellate courts, as well as matters in federal trial courts and regulatory and legal counseling.

Read More

Experience

  • (D.C. Cir.) – Represented a major interstate natural gas pipeline company in successfully defending FERC's approval of a $390 million pipeline project and its predetermination that the project's costs may be rolled into system rates in a future rate proceeding

  • (U.S.) – Briefed and argued case involving the copyrightability of annotations to a state’s official code

  • (11th Cir.) — Secured affirmance of summary judgment in favor of airline client in putative antitrust class action alleging price-fixing of checked baggage fees 

  • (D.C. Cir.) – Successfully defended award of summary judgment to government contractor in False Claims Act suit 

  • (Fed. Cir.) – Successfully defended judgment favoring government contractor in bid protest

  • (6th Cir.) – Briefed and argued challenge to a Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration enforcement order against a pipeline operator

  • (1st Cir.); (D.Mass.) – Secured and successfully defended on appeal district court order holding that Natural Gas Act preempted the application of a municipal ordinance to a federally approved natural gas pipeline compressor station

  • (1st Cir.) – Successfully defended air permit for natural gas pipeline compressor station against numerous Clean Air Act and state-law challenges; successfully argued against vacatur of permit on one issue where Court concluded additional analysis by state agency was needed, and then successfully defended agency’s reaffirmance of air permit in subsequent post-remand appeal

  • (2d Cir.) – Drafted briefs in appeal from a criminal conviction in a case involving an alleged violation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, among other charges

  • (U.S.); (5th Cir.); (W.D. Tex.) – Obtained summary judgment defending the State Bar of Texas against a First Amendment mandatory bar challenge; on appeal, the Fifth Circuit vacated and granted partial summary judgment and a preliminary injunction to the three plaintiffs, but upheld the vast majority of the Bar’s challenged initiatives as constitutional; the U.S. Supreme Court denied our opponents’ cert petition

Credentials

Education

  • Yale Law School, J.D., 2009 (Senior Editor, The Yale Law Journal)
  • Yale University, B.A., Ethics, Politics, & Economics summa cum laude, 2006 (Phi Beta Kappa)

Admissions

  • District of Columbia
  • Texas
  • Virginia

Expand All

Recognitions

  • The National Law Journal, D.C. Rising Star, 2020
  • Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution: Appellate, 2020 and 2021
  • Selected to the Washington, D.C. Rising Stars list, Super Lawyers (Thomson Reuters), 2016, 2017, 2019
  • Work recognized in Law360 feature, “Top Gov’t Contracts Cases of 2017: Mid-Year Report”, July 2017
  • Recipient: American Gateways’ Access to Justice Award, 2014
Insights

Client Alerts

Shut Door, Open Window: Eleventh Circuit Vacates Landmark District Court Ruling That the False Claims Act’s Qui Tam Provisions Violate the Appointments Clause

On September 1, 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its widely anticipated decision in …

September 3, 2026

September 3, 2026 • 8-minute read

Client Alerts

California Pipeline Ruling Signals Expansive Defense Production Act Preemption Power

On August 19, 2026, Judge Stephen V. Wilson of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled that a Trump administration order under the Defense Production Act (“DPA”) allows Sable Offshore Corporation to flow oil through its onshore pipeline, despite California’s contention that the pipeline’s operation violates state law.

August 25, 2026

August 25, 2026 • 8-minute read

Client Alerts

Supreme Court Curbs Agency-Head Removal Protections in Trump v. Slaughter and Trump v. Cook: Implications for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

In a pair of decisions issued on June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed the constitutional …

July 1, 2026

July 1, 2026 • 9-minute read

Client Alerts

A New Two-Step Dance: Supreme Court Decision Complicates Relief for Government Grant and Contract Terminations

Organizations challenging an agency’s termination of a grant or government contract based on an allegedly illegal government policy need to master a two-step dance, according to a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision.

August 26, 2025 • V&E Supreme Court Update Published by Westlaw Today, Thomson Reuters, October 2025

August 26, 2025 • 10-minute read

Should They Stay, and Will It Go? SCOTUS Weighs ETS’ Fate Background Image
News & Achievements