Client Alerts
On May 27, 2026, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a memorandum opinion in Le Clair …
June 23, 2026
June 23, 2026 • 10-minute read
Partner
Commercial & Business Litigation
Jason Halper is a partner in Vinson & Elkins’ Complex Commercial Litigation practice group, with decades of experience practicing in the areas of financial services and securities law, complex commercial disputes and corporate governance. Prior to joining Vinson & Elkins, Jason served as Chair of the Global Litigation Group and was a member of the Management Committee of a New York-based global law firm.
Clients consistently return to engage Jason because of his track record of obtaining results that meet each client’s unique needs — as described in Chambers USA, “he is secure, confident and a skilled litigator. Jason is exactly the kind of partner a client wants by their side during a thorny litigation or arbitration — he’s always prepared, extremely disciplined in his thinking and calm in the heat of battle as well as being a consummate strategist.”
Jason is an experienced trial lawyer, with Chambers noting that he is “very capable in the courtroom.” He has tried cases to jury verdict or other decision in federal and state courts, regulatory tribunals and arbitrations around the country, including among others, the Southern District of New York, the District of Columbia, the Northern District of Illinois, the District of New Jersey, the Southern District of Ohio, and the Western District of Oklahoma; the Delaware Court of Chancery; state courts in California, Connecticut, Maryland and New York; and arbitration panels under the auspices of FINRA, NYSE, AAA, JAMS and others.
His clients include public and private companies, underwriters, lenders, professional services firms and their partners, corporate directors and other individuals in a variety of industries, including financial services, professional services, insurance, energy, defense, pharmaceuticals, manufacturing, real estate, supermarkets and telecommunications.
Jason represents these clients in securities, derivative, ERISA and RICO class actions, SEC, FINRA and stock exchange investigations and arbitrations, internal investigations, suits claiming breaches of fiduciary duty, insider trading or other misconduct by corporate directors, substantial financial instrument and other contract disputes, bankruptcy-related proceedings, and litigation arising from M&A or other transactions involving changes in or contests for corporate control in the Delaware Court of Chancery and elsewhere.
Jason is also a Lecturer in Law, focusing on corporate law issues involving governance, sustainability, compliance, and ethics, at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, and is a member of the Advisory Board of Harvard Law School’s Program on Corporate Governance. A frequent speaker and author, he has contributed over 80 articles to the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, and also published in, among others, Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, The New York Law Journal and Columbia Law School’s Blue Sky Blog on Corporations and the Capital Markets.
A global asset management company in an ERISA class action commenced in federal court in Colorado alleging that the company and retirement plan trustees breached fiduciary duties in connection with proprietary investment options offered to plan participants
A medical device company and its directors and officers in litigation in federal courts in New York, Delaware and Massachusetts alleging that disclosure to shareholders in connection with the company’s merger with a global healthcare company violated the federal securities laws
A multi-billion dollar asset management firm in litigation commenced by stockholders in Delaware and New York challenging a merger transaction
A hedge fund in connection with allegations of improper trading in the securities of a company in which it was invested and on whose board it had representatives
An oil and gas producer in a bondholder class action commenced in the Southern District of New York challenging the terms of a debt exchange offer
A global financial institution in multi-state litigations relating to claims of manipulative conduct in violation of state securities laws and RICO in connection with certain short selling activities
A global financial institution in litigation in Illinois, Nevada, New York, Ohio and Oklahoma federal courts relating to the issuance of commercial mortgage-backed securities involving commercial loans originated by the financial institution
A global pharmaceutical company and its directors in federal securities and ERISA class actions and derivative litigation relating to the marketing and sale of certain classes of drugs
A major financial institution’s directors in numerous shareholder derivative actions over a 10-year period claiming breaches of fiduciary duties
A financial institution in a shareholder class action challenging its merger with another industry participant
A global investment bank in connection with an SEC inquiry into prime brokerage activities
A global commodities trading firm in connection with a stock exchange inquiry into trading practices by certain employees
A global consulting firm in connection with an FTC investigation into potential anti-competitive practices by the firm’s client
A public company director in connection with a FINRA investigation into trading in the company’s securities
A public REIT in the hospitality business in connection with a cybersecurity breach at its reservations system vendor
A medical devices company in connection with an SEC investigation into alleged FCPA and related books and records violations
A former employee of an international financial institution in connection with a CFTC investigation into alleged manipulation of reference benchmark rates
A global financial institution in connection with a FERC investigation and lawsuit related to alleged manipulation of commodity prices
A global financial institution in connection with a FINRA investigation into alleged FINRA Rule violations by employees in its prime brokerage business
A financial institution and one of its senior executives in an SEC insider trading investigation
A multibillion dollar hedge fund in an SEC investigation into trading and disclosure practices
A broker-dealer in a New York Stock Exchange investigation into alleged improper trading in and handling of customer accounts
A global insurance company in litigation it commenced in federal court in Tennessee seeking to collect on a guarantee associated with the guarantor’s coal mining companies, which failed to honor contractual obligations associated with surety bonds issued by the insurer
Several global financial institutions, headquartered in the United States and abroad, to advise on litigation risks and solutions arising from LIBOR transition issues, including how to address trillions of dollars of existing LIBOR-based contracts, the constitutionality of legislation that addresses these legacy LIBOR contracts, and the potential interaction of UK and US legislative efforts
A hedge fund in litigation in the Southern District of New York asserting that an asset management firm, which had seeded the fund, breached its contractual and disclosure obligations to the fund
A private global consulting firm in litigation in the Southern District of New York asserting that a client breached its contractual obligation to pay tens of millions of dollars associated with improved performance and financial results in one of its main business lines
A public global consulting firm in connection with disputes arising out of hiring a competitor’s former employees
A multinational corporation in federal court in Nebraska and New York concerning disputed obligations under guaranteed investment contracts
A global financial institution in six federal court actions relating to its origination, underwriting or closing of commercial loans securitized in CMBS transactions
An investment management firm in one federal and two state court actions commenced by investors in synthetic and cash collateralized debt obligations (CDO) claiming that the investment firm failed to properly manage the underlying reference portfolio or assets of the CDO
A global financial institution in litigation involving claims that it breached an oral contact requiring it to convey its interest in a mezzanine loan to the borrower
A real estate investment firm in litigation commenced by a junior loan participant in connection with a contemplated sale of the loan
A global financial services company in litigation seeking to require the repurchase of securitized loans
A military defense contractor in litigations in California state court defending claims by former employees asserting breach of an oral contract to provide them an interest in one of the company’s operating units, and asserting misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of contract claims against one of the former employees
A nuclear fuel producer in four federal court actions claiming that it breached contracts for the sale of uranium
A nuclear fuel producer in four actions pending in Australia commenced against it by a party to a joint venture agreement asserting claims for breach of the joint venture agreement and related alleged misconduct in connection with the development of one of the world’s largest uranium resources located in South Australia
A global insurance company in an arbitration commenced by former owners of companies it acquired related to the adequacy of post-closing loss reserves
A medical device company and its directors and officers in litigation in federal courts in New York, Delaware and Massachusetts alleging that disclosure to shareholders in connection with the company’s merger with a global healthcare company violated the federal securities laws
A multi-billion dollar asset management firm in litigation commenced against the company and its directors in Delaware and New York challenging a merger transaction
A hedge fund in litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery asserting claims that a company in which it invested failed to timely hold its annual meeting or to qualify the fund’s nominees to the board so as to avoid triggering change-in-control/proxy put penalties in the company’s financing and employment arrangements
A public real estate development company in litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery commenced by a minority stockholder alleging breach of fiduciary duty in connection with the board’s approval of certain executive compensation arrangements
A public REIT in derivative litigation challenging the board’s approval of certain agreements with its affiliates
A financial services firm in connection with an appraisal proceeding in the Delaware Court of Chancery arising out of the Dell take-private transaction
A technology services company in litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery arising out of its acquisition of another industry participant
The controlling stockholder of two global media companies in the Delaware Court of Chancery arising out disputes relating to board composition and other corporate matters
Investors in a publicly traded asset management company seeking appraisal of their shares following a merger transaction
A global pharmaceutical company in an action in the Delaware Court of Chancery arising from its unsolicited acquisition offer for and attempt to elect a majority of directors of another industry participant
A global pharmaceutical company in litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery and New Jersey state and federal courts arising from its proposed acquisition of another industry participant
A regional airline in concurrent Delaware Court of Chancery and federal court litigation arising from its unsolicited acquisition offer for another airline
An international hotel operator in concurrent Delaware Court of Chancery and federal court actions arising from a contested election of directors and related federal securities law claims
The CEO of an international clothing retailer in a Delaware Court of Chancery action and related special committee investigation into corporate transactions supposedly benefiting the CEO
The founder of a technology company in concurrent New Jersey Chancery and federal court litigation involving a contested election of directors and related federal securities law claims
Outside directors of a closely held company in litigation by minority shareholders claiming oppression, self-dealing and breaches of fiduciary duty
A software company in an action seeking to enjoin its merger with another industry participant
A financial institution’s directors in derivative litigation and a related special committee investigation challenging allegedly deceptive trading activity
Education
Admissions
Jason has been recognized for his legal abilities by numerous publications and associations, including:
Client Alerts
On May 27, 2026, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a memorandum opinion in Le Clair …
June 23, 2026
June 23, 2026 • 10-minute read
Client Alerts
Supreme Court Holds Investment Company Act Section 47(b) Does Not Create a Private Right of Action
On June 11, 2026, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, …
June 17, 2026
June 17, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Silence No More, But Speak with Care: SEC Rescinds the “No-Deny” Settlement Policy
On May 18, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”) announced that it had rescinded Rule …
May 27, 2026
May 27, 2026 • 5-minute read
Articles
5 Strategies for Effective AI Governance
1. Map the Risk Landscape Effective AI governance begins with a comprehensive, clear-eyed assessment of where and how the company …
May 26, 2026
May 26, 2026 • 2-minute read
Client Alerts
Delaware Court of Chancery Upholds Removal of “Imperious” CEO Under DGCL Section 225
On April 20, 2026, Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster issued a post-trial opinion in DSM HoldCo, Inc. v. Demoulas, C.A. No. 2025-1020-JTL (Del. Ch. Apr. 20, 2026), an action brought under 8 Del. C. § 225(a) by the parent holding company (the “Company”) of the Market Basket grocery chain, its operating subsidiary Demoulas Super Markets, Inc., and three independent directors—Jay K. Hachigian, Steven J. Collins, and Michael Keyes (the “Current Directors”)—against Arthur T. Demoulas (“Demoulas”), the Company’s longtime President and CEO.
May 18, 2026
May 18, 2026 • 10-minute read
Awards & Rankings
The Legal 500 US 2026 recommended Vinson & Elkins as a leading law firm in 47 practice categories. In total, …
June 10, 2026
June 10, 2026 • 3-minute read
Awards & Rankings
Vinson & Elkins announced today that it achieved 20 Band 1 rankings in Chambers USA 2026: Nationwide: Energy Transition; Energy: …
June 4, 2026
June 4, 2026 • 3-minute read
Awards & Rankings
Lawdragon Names 34 Vinson & Elkins Lawyers to Its 2026 500 Leading Litigators in America Guide
Lawdragon has recognized 34 Vinson & Elkins attorneys in its 2026 500 Leading Litigators in America guide.
September 12, 2025
September 12, 2025 • 1-minute read
Awards & Rankings
The Best Lawyers in America (BL Rankings, LLC) has named 125 Vinson & Elkins lawyers in its “Best Lawyers” category in the 2026 edition. Additionally, 76 Vinson & Elkins attorneys have been named in the “Ones to Watch” category, which recognizes lawyers with 5–10 years’ experience. Some individuals are listed in more than one practice area, giving the firm a total of 305 rankings.
August 21, 2025
August 21, 2025 • 3-minute read
Awards & Rankings
The Legal 500 US 2025 recommended Vinson & Elkins as a leading law firm in 43 practice categories. In total, 133 attorneys are recognized, many in more than one category. Vinson & Elkins attorneys earned multiple special designations, such as “Leading Trial Lawyer,’ “Hall of Fame,” “Leading Partner,” “Next Generation Partner,” and “Leading Associate.”
June 11, 2025
June 11, 2025 • 3-minute read
our People
Please note that any communication with Vinson & Elkins via e-mail through this website does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with V&E. Please do not send any confidential information. A conflicts-of-interest procedure must be completed by V&E prior to establishment of an attorney-client relationship. When you execute an engagement letter from V&E you will be our client, and you may then exchange information freely with a V&E attorney.
By clicking “Accept,” you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if it is highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.