Events
Vinson & Elkins is a sponsor of the UT Law CLE 2025 Oil, Gas, and Energy Taxation Symposium, taking place Wednesday, November 19 in Houston, Texas.
November 19, 2025
November 19, 2025 • 1-minute read
Senior Partner
Tax
“I have the good fortune to lead a group of tax lawyers who not only enjoy mastering the intricacies of the tax code, but who also communicate in plain English and look for practical ways to help clients achieve their objectives.”
George is Co-Head of the firm’s Tax Controversy Practice. During his more than three decades with V&E, George has tried cases in the United States Tax Court and Federal District Courts and handled many appeals. While he has been involved in many high-profile court cases, often establishing key precedents along the way, George is equally proud of the more numerous matters that never made headlines — ones where solutions were reached after sometimes tough, but always civil, debate with the government. By developing strategy early, preparing cases meticulously, and negotiating firmly, he and his team have frequently resolved their clients’ IRS audits and appeals on a cost-effective basis, avoiding court proceedings altogether.
Having sustained clients’ tax positions on a wide variety of contested matters, George brings a unique perspective to the structuring and documentation of complex transactions. He believes it is important also to take a multi-disciplinary approach to accommodate sometimes competing objectives, and so he regularly works closely with clients’ tax executives and in-house counsel, as well as financial and operating personnel, external auditors and various consultants. George particularly relishes the opportunity to address emerging issues at the intersection of tax law and other legal disciplines, such as intellectual property law. Like others in V&E’s tax practice, George takes a practical, commercial approach.
George is recognized nationwide in tax controversy and litigation by Chambers USA. One client notes “George has so much experience and a wealth of knowledge of both the technical matters and the court system.” (2026).
U.S. and non-U.S. based multinational public companies with providing outside tax counsel on issues spanning the Internal Revenue Code; experienced in using wide array of alternative dispute resolution techniques, including mediation, arbitration, fast track settlement, Pre-Filing Agreements; and has handled summons enforcement matters
Publicly traded partnerships, such as MLPs, and private partnerships in disputes concerning the partnership tax provisions of Subchapter K, including disputes over allocations, distributions and basis adjustments; extensive experience handling partnership examinations and litigation under both the TEFRA and BBA Centralized Partnership Audit regimes
Federal income tax and excise tax refund litigation in the U.S. District Courts
Disputes between formerly affiliated corporations in resolving disputes under tax sharing agreements as well as tax indemnification disputes between parties to merger & acquisition transactions
Private equity and hedge funds and their investors in TEFRA and non-TEFRA partnership examinations involving a variety of partnership and international tax issues, including the sourcing of income, withholding tax, and existence of a U.S. trade or business
Global high-net-worth individuals and their closely held companies in IRS audit initiative
Corporate clients—both “inbound” and “outbound”—in establishing, documenting, and defending intercompany transfer pricing strategies and policies; extensive experience in disputes involving cost-sharing arrangements; has negotiated Advance Pricing Agreements
The Williams Companies, Inc. v. Energy Transfer Equity, L.P., __ A.3d. __ WL 1090912 (Del. 2017), affirming WL 3576682 (Del. Ch. June 24, 2016) (Member of trial team representing Energy Transfer Equity, LP in Delaware Chancery Court in litigation over termination of merger agreement with The Williams Companies based on failure of condition precedent relating to the provision of a tax opinion under Section 721 of the Internal Revenue Code; trial result for Energy Transfer affirmed by Delaware Supreme Court)
BMC Software Inc. v. Commissioner, No. 13-60684 (5th Cir., March 13, 2015) – Reversing Tax Court on IRC §965 dividends received deduction for repatriated cash
Trinity Industries, Inc. v. U.S., 757 F.3d 400 (2014) – Affirming in part and vacating and remanding in part, District Court on research and development tax credit “consistency rule”
Halliburton Co. v. Commissioner, 946 F.2d 395 (1991) – Affirming Tax Court and upholding bad debt and worthless stock deductions arising from 1979 Iranian expropriation
Corporate spin-offs and other divisive transactions
Technology licenses and joint ventures
Pass-through entities including REITs and publicly traded partnerships (MLPs) in a variety of transactional matters
Business clients in structuring complex financing arrangements, including the use of hybrid instruments and hybrid entities
Education
Admissions
Events
Vinson & Elkins is a sponsor of the UT Law CLE 2025 Oil, Gas, and Energy Taxation Symposium, taking place Wednesday, November 19 in Houston, Texas.
November 19, 2025
November 19, 2025 • 1-minute read
Client Alerts
The Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) have released final regulations designating so-called “basis-shifting” transactions among related parties as “transactions of interest.”
January 13, 2025 • V&E Tax Update
January 13, 2025 • 4-minute read
Client Alerts
In the final decision of the Supreme Court’s term, the Court again considered the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”).
July 3, 2024 • V&E Tax Update
July 3, 2024 • 3-minute read
Client Alerts
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has overruled the Chevron doctrine, fundamentally altering the landscape of administrative law and significantly impacting federal tax administration.
July 1, 2024 • V&E Tax Update
July 1, 2024 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
IRS, Treasury Look to Challenge So-Called Basis-Shifting Transactions, But It Won’t Be Easy
The Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) announced the latest chapter in the long-trumpeted enforcement initiative aimed at large partnerships.
June 18, 2024 • V&E Tax Update
June 18, 2024 • 4-minute read
Awards & Rankings
The Legal 500 US 2026 recommended Vinson & Elkins as a leading law firm in 47 practice categories. In total, …
June 10, 2026
June 10, 2026 • 3-minute read
Awards & Rankings
Vinson & Elkins announced today that it achieved 20 Band 1 rankings in Chambers USA 2026: Nationwide: Energy Transition; Energy: …
June 4, 2026
June 4, 2026 • 3-minute read
Awards & Rankings
Lawdragon Names 34 Vinson & Elkins Lawyers to Its 2026 500 Leading Litigators in America Guide
Lawdragon has recognized 34 Vinson & Elkins attorneys in its 2026 500 Leading Litigators in America guide.
September 12, 2025
September 12, 2025 • 1-minute read
Awards & Rankings
The Best Lawyers in America (BL Rankings, LLC) has named 125 Vinson & Elkins lawyers in its “Best Lawyers” category in the 2026 edition. Additionally, 76 Vinson & Elkins attorneys have been named in the “Ones to Watch” category, which recognizes lawyers with 5–10 years’ experience. Some individuals are listed in more than one practice area, giving the firm a total of 305 rankings.
August 21, 2025
August 21, 2025 • 3-minute read
Awards & Rankings
The Legal 500 US 2025 recommended Vinson & Elkins as a leading law firm in 43 practice categories. In total, 133 attorneys are recognized, many in more than one category. Vinson & Elkins attorneys earned multiple special designations, such as “Leading Trial Lawyer,’ “Hall of Fame,” “Leading Partner,” “Next Generation Partner,” and “Leading Associate.”
June 11, 2025
June 11, 2025 • 3-minute read
our People
Please note that any communication with Vinson & Elkins via e-mail through this website does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with V&E. Please do not send any confidential information. A conflicts-of-interest procedure must be completed by V&E prior to establishment of an attorney-client relationship. When you execute an engagement letter from V&E you will be our client, and you may then exchange information freely with a V&E attorney.
By clicking “Accept,” you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if it is highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.