Sean Becker

Partner

Labor & Employment

“Employment-related challenges can present some of the most important, and sensitive, issues that our clients face. I help them manage those matters by leveraging my experience as a litigator, transactional lawyer and advisor. Together, my colleagues and I provide highly practical, commercial advice and resolve sensitive employment matters efficiently and effectively.”

Sean Becker

Overview

Sean Becker is the head of the Employment, Labor and OSHA practice and a member of the firm’s Management Committee. He brings a unique perspective to his work advising clients on day-to-day employment issues and transaction-related employment matters: As an experienced employment litigator, he can identify and navigate potential liabilities that might otherwise go unnoticed. It’s a skill that has proved invaluable as Sean has managed a variety of sensitive employment-related matters and managed the labor and employment aspects of hundreds of acquisitions, divestitures and other transactions.

Read More

Experience

  • Mitsubishi Corporation in its $5.2 billion acquisition of Aethon Energy Management’s Texas and Louisiana shale production and infrastructure assets (pending)

  • Vital Energy (NYSE: VTLE) in its $3.1 billion acquisition by Crescent Energy Company (NYSE: CRGY)

  • (Multiple jurisdictions) — Obtained successful outcomes in pursuing and defending matters relating to alleged employee non-competition, non-solicitation and unfair competition

  • (S.D. Tex.); (5th Cir.) — Obtained summary judgment and Fifth Circuit affirmation of summary judgment on behalf of an international oil company in consolidated ERISA benefits litigation brought by former executive employees

  • Switchback Energy Acquisition Corporation in its $2.4 billion business combination with ChargePoint, an electric vehicle charging network

  • Blackstone Infrastructure Partners in its $3.3 billion acquisition of a controlling interest in Tallgrass Energy 

  • (Iowa Dist.) — First chair of Iowa state court trial in which the application of employer’s drug testing policy was challenged, and employee’s requests for reinstatement and damages following positive tests were denied. Obtained affirmation of decision in case of first impression argued before the Iowa Supreme Court

  • Obtained directed verdict on a former chief executive’s wrongful termination claim and a successful resolution of breach of contract claim after three-day arbitration

  • Riverstone Holdings in the $9.5 billion formation of Talen Energy Corporation, one of the largest independent power producers in the U.S., through a Reverse Morris Trust spin-off of PPL Corporation’s merchant power generation business and the concurrent combination thereof with Riverstone’s merchant power generation business and associated debt financings

Expand All

Credentials

Education

  • Harvard Law School, J.D. cum laude, 1998
  • Harvard College, B.A., Government magna cum laude, 1994

Admissions

  • Massachusetts
  • Texas
  • United States Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern, Southern, and Western Districts of Texas
  • U.S. District of Court for the District of Massachusetts

Expand All

Recognitions

  • Lawdragon, 500 Leading U.S. Corporate Employment Lawyers, 2021, 2022, 2025, and 2026
  • Chambers USA, Labor & Employment (Texas), 2016–2026
  • The Best Lawyers in America© (BL Rankings, LLC), Litigation–Labor and Employment (Houston), 2017–2027
  • Euromoney’s Benchmark Litigation, Labor & Employment, South Stars, 2018
  • Selected to the Texas Super Lawyers list, Super Lawyers (Thomson Reuters), 2012–2025
  • MergerLinks, Top Dealmakers: Employment (North America), 2021
Insights

Articles

“No More Non-Competes,” Part Five: FTC Abandons Rule Prohibiting Non-Compete Agreements but Advances Targeted Enforcement

On September 5, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) formally abandoned its efforts to enforce a Biden-era final rule (“Rule”) implementing a blanket ban on most employee non-compete agreements. Instead, the FTC signaled its intent to challenge non-compete agreements on a case-by-case basis. To that end, the FTC announced an enforcement action challenging one company’s non-compete agreements, published a request for information (“RFI”) seeking the public’s input on non-compete provisions, sent warning letters to several health care companies regarding their employment agreements, and announced a future workshop on this subject. Together, these actions could mark the beginning of a new, more targeted enforcement landscape and create new uncertainties for employers on the legality of non-compete agreements.

October 1, 2025

October 1, 2025 • 3-minute read

An Opportunity to Tell the Government What’s Right with Non-compete Agreements Background Decorative Image

Client Alerts

Wage-Fixing: An Alternative to DOJ’s No-Poach Prosecutions?

On April 14, 2025, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) obtained a high-profile “wage-fixing” conviction under the Sherman Act against a former executive of multiple home health care agencies (“HHAs”).

April 23, 2025 • V&E Antitrust Update

April 23, 2025 • 2-minute read

DOJ's Aggressive Pursuit of 'No Poachers' Background Image

Client Alerts

New Federal Guidance Addresses Workplace Discrimination Questions

On March 19, 2025, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) issued two technical assistance documents (the “DEI Guidance”) addressing the application of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) to employers’ diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”) policies and practices.

March 24, 2025

March 24, 2025 • 3-minute read

Property Lines: Where Employee Rights Meet Company Property Rights Background Decorative Image

Client Alerts

President Trump Takes Aim at Affirmative Action and DEI Via Executive Order

On January 21, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order titled “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity” (the “Executive Order”), which significantly impacts not only requirements applicable to federal government contractors and subcontractors, but also could lead to private sector investigations or enforcement actions concerning Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (“DEI”) initiatives — particularly those maintained by larger companies (whether privately held or publicly listed), regardless of whether they contract or subcontract with the government.

January 24, 2025

January 24, 2025 • 3-minute read

Three Quick Takeaways on the SEC’s Approval of Nasdaq’s Board Diversity Rules Background Image

Client Alerts

Five Predictions for President Trump’s Second Administration: Employment and Labor

Looking toward a second administration under President-elect Trump, we anticipate a shift toward more employer-friendly labor policies and away from interpretations of law that afforded more expansive protections to employees. While we cannot predict with certainty how the second Trump administration will impact labor and employment laws, our analysis considers positions and actions taken during the first Trump administration, statements made during his campaign, and the composition of his expected team.

January 7, 2025

January 7, 2025 • 7-minute read

Biden Administration Raises Minimum Wage for Federal Government Contractors As Congress Mulls $2 Billion Infrastructure Plan Background Image
News & Achievements