Events
Jenny Speck to Speak at Lockton U.S. Energy Risk Summit
Partner Jenny Speck will speak at Lockton’s U.S. Energy Risk Summit on November 12, 2026, in Houston, Texas. The summit …
November 12, 2026
November 12, 2026 • 1-minute read
Insight
Client Alerts
December 16, 2020 • 7-minute read
Nationally and globally, there is growing focus on renewable fuels as a potentially profitable part of the strategy to reduce carbon emissions and mitigate climate change. While a number of renewable fuels regulations and governmental incentives have been in force in the U.S. for nearly a decade, the intense investor, corporate and governmental focus on environmental, social and governance issues (“ESG”), together with advances in technologies and industry maturation, may be leading to an inflection point. In the U.S., governmental policies directed towards incentivizing renewable fuels, both in the form of regulatory requirements to produce a certain volume of renewable fuels annually and also the generation of tax and environmental credits resulting from the production of renewable fuels, may represent an area for compromise between the incoming Biden administration and a possible divided Congress with respect to climate change and energy policy.1 These incentives contribute significantly to making renewable fuels attractive to producers, importers, and blenders of transportation fuels, as well as investors.
This will be the first in a series of pieces discussing legal and related topics that could be relevant to projects and transactions involving renewable fuels. In this introduction, we provide a general overview of renewable fuels, certain incentive programs that are available for renewable fuels, and the market for renewable fuels.
Bioenergy is energy, typically in gaseous or liquid form, produced from biomass. In gaseous form, bioenergy is referred to as biogas, and in liquid form, bioenergy is referred to as biofuel. Biomass is organic matter that is converted to energy through combustion, or through thermochemical, biochemical or chemical processes. Truly “renewable” biofuels are derived from organic sources that theoretically can be replaced in the environment naturally at a rate sufficient to keep up with consumption. Some biofuels are chemically very similar (if not identical) to petroleum gasoline, diesel, or aviation fuel, and can be used in existing engines and infrastructure without the need for blending with traditional fuels or modification to the engine or infrastructure (although they may be blended).2 Fuels such as these are sometimes referred to as “green” or “drop-in” biofuels. Other biofuels are chemically different and must be blended with traditional petroleum based fuels and may only be blended up to a limit of the overall fuel mixture. The difference between renewable diesel and biodiesel a good example. Both can be used in compression ignition diesel engines, are produced from generally the same feedstocks, and are treated very similar for purposes of key tax incentives. They also both potentially result in meaningful carbon emission reductions relative to hydrocarbon fuels. They are, however, chemically different, produced by distinctly different processes, and where renewable diesel can be fully substituted for petroleum diesel, biodiesel must generally be mixed with petroleum diesel in ratios less than 20% (otherwise, significant modifications to standard diesel engines are likely required).
Renewable Fuel Standard
The Renewable Fuel Standard (“RFS”) requires U.S. transportation fuel to contain a minimum volume of designated renewable fuels. The volume amounts are statutory targets through 2022, after which the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has statutory authority to determine the target volume amounts. In its final rulemaking for the RFS 2020 standards, the EPA calls for 20.09 billion gallons of total renewable fuel. The EPA administers the RFS and is responsible for (i) evaluating “fuel pathways” and which renewable fuels are eligible for the RFS program, (ii) establishing the volumes of renewable fuel that will be required for a compliance year based on the statutory targets, fuel supply and other conditions and (iii) monitoring compliance with the RFS using the system of tradable credits referred to as renewable identification numbers (“RINs”). In order to generate RINs, a renewable fuel producer must be registered under the RFS program. Registration requires providing the EPA with technical information regarding the production of the renewable fuel.
RINs are generated when a producer makes a gallon of renewable fuel. A RIN can be traded between parties once it is “separated” from the batch of renewable fuel that generated the RIN in accordance with applicable EPA regulations. “Obligated parties” under RFS are refiners or importers of gasoline or diesel fuel in the United States. Each obligated party is assigned an EPA-specified renewable volume obligation (“RVO”) that is based on a percentage of the determined RFS volume requirements for the applicable compliance year and projections of gasoline and diesel production for that year. An obligated party complies by either producing renewable fuels, or by purchasing sufficient RINs for each applicable category of renewable fuels for the applicable compliance year. Under limited circumstances, obligated parties can petition the EPA for a waiver from the RFS’s renewable fuel mandates.3
Federal Income Tax Credits
Federal law currently provides tax incentives relating to the production and blending of renewable diesel and biodiesel. These incentives include three income tax credits for fuels containing renewable diesel or biodiesel: (i) a blender credit of $1.00 per gallon of biodiesel used in the production of a “qualified biodiesel mixture” (which includes renewable diesel and biodiesel) that is sold or used as fuel by the producer (the “Blender Credit”); (ii) a credit of $1.00 per gallon of R100 renewable diesel or B100 biodiesel produced and either sold at retail or used as fuel by the producer (the “Producer Credit”); and (iii) a small agri-biodiesel producer credit of $0.10 per gallon of qualified agri-biodiesel (biodiesel derived from virgin oils) that is produced by a qualified producer4 (the “Small-Agri Credit”). The Blender Credit and Producer Credit are mutually exclusive. The Small-Agri Credit can be combined with both the Blender Credit and the Producer Credit with respect to agri-biodiesel only. In lieu of a credit against income taxes, a blender may claim a refundable credit against its fuel excise tax liability in the same amount as the Blender Credit. No tax credits are allowed under any of the programs unless the fuel is either produced within or used within the United States. These tax credits currently apply to any sale or use of the applicable fuel through December 31, 2022.
California Low Carbon Fuel Standard
California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (“LCFS”), administered by the California Air Resources Board, is designed to encourage the use of cleaner, low-carbon transportation fuels in California, encourage the production of those fuels, and thereby reduce greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions and decrease petroleum dependence in the transportation sector. Fuel producers, importers, and certain other parties in the State of California, are subject to the LCFS. Parties that sell or offer for sale transportation fuels in California are required to meet annual carbon intensity reduction targets or buy LCFS credits to meet the standards. LCFS standards are based on the “carbon intensity” (“CI”) of gasoline and diesel fuel and their respective substitutes. CI is measured in terms of grams of carbon dioxide (“CO2”) equivalent per megajoule of energy (gCO2e per MJ). Low carbon fuels below the CI benchmark generate credits, while fuels above the CI benchmark generate deficits. Credits and deficits are denominated in metric tons of GHG emissions (avoided or emitted based on the baseline and the corresponding reductions) and credits can be sold, banked, or used to satisfy a compliance obligation. Other U.S. states are exploring the implementation of programs substantially similar or modeled after the LCFS program and Canada is exploring the implementation of a nationwide program.
The renewable diesel and biodiesel sector is still a relatively young and small (but growing), especially when compared to the existing corn ethanol sector. Profitability for all of these sectors still mainly depends on government policy incentives such as the tax credits mentioned above. Renewable fuel is among the most rapidly growing renewable energy technologies. In particular, renewable diesel production, while still only accounting for a small fraction of the diesel fuel market in the U.S., has grown due to the federal incentives and the LCFS. This, in turn, has made renewable diesel attractive to oil refiners during the COVID-19 pandemic due to the reduced demand for transportation fuel, and several petroleum refiners have announced plans to convert existing facilities to produce renewable fuels. Production of renewable diesel is up roughly 7% in 2020.5 Some analysts have predicted that refineries could produce as much as 3.8 billion gallons of renewable diesel by 2025, which would account for approximately 5% of total diesel fuel production in the U.S. during 2019. However, availability of feedstock in the form of used cooking oils, grease and rendered animal fat could be a limiting factor on this growth, especially given the decline in restaurant demand during the COVID-19 pandemic.6 Distiller’s corn oil (a by-product of ethanol production), soybean oil and other virgin oils can also be used to produce renewable diesel; however, soybean oil costs more to produce and yields lower LCFS credits, and as a result, is less favored than other feedstocks. Additionally, the use of virgin oils presents land use issues, and advanced renewable fuels produced from cellulose are still developing in terms of technology and scalability.
The renewable fuels sector is poised to be a part of the growing renewable energy sector in the U.S. Due to governmental incentives, renewable fuels are a profitable alternative to traditional refined petroleum products during a time of low demand, as is evidenced by the growth in renewable diesel production despite the recent economic downturn. This demand-resilient profitability, coupled with increased efforts to reduce GHG emissions from the transportation sector, could cause renewable fuels to remain attractive as the U.S. economy rebounds.
2 Link to Department of Energy.
3 There are several different waiver provisions available under the RFS. One such provision, the small refiner waiver provision, is currently the subject of ongoing litigation in the D.C. Circuit following a decision in the 10th Circuit earlier this year severely restricting the ability of refiners to seek small refiner waivers unless they had done so consistently since 2011. Regulatory requirements related to the RFS (including the ability of obligated parties to seek waivers from the RFS’s mandates) will be the subject of future articles.
4 A qualified producer is generally a producer who has a productive capacity for agri-biodiesel of 60 million gallons or less.
6 Id.
This information is provided by Vinson & Elkins LLP for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended, nor should it be construed, as legal advice.
Discover our latest:
Events
Jenny Speck to Speak at Lockton U.S. Energy Risk Summit
Partner Jenny Speck will speak at Lockton’s U.S. Energy Risk Summit on November 12, 2026, in Houston, Texas. The summit …
November 12, 2026
November 12, 2026 • 1-minute read
CLE Events
Sixth Annual Navigating the Annual Meeting and Reporting Season
Join leading practitioners and industry voices for a timely discussion of the legal, regulatory, and governance developments shaping the next proxy season.
November 11, 2026
November 11, 2026 • 2-minute read
Events
Jenny Speck Speaking at 2026 AFCC Global Biobased Economy Conference
Partner Jenny Speck will speak at the 2026 AFCC Global Biobased Economy Conference & Exhibit in a session titled “Tax …
November 3, 2026
November 3, 2026 • 1-minute read
Articles
Executive Order 14421: Managing the Risk of a Ban on Chinese Grid Equipment
The nation’s electric grid depends heavily on foreign-made equipment, much of it from China. Depending on how the Dept. of …
October 30, 2026
October 30, 2026 • 1-minute read
Podcasts
Powering Progress Episode 14 – Environmental Litigation and the New Data Center Playbook
This series has explored the extraordinary investment flowing into data centers and the challenges surrounding power, real estate, financing, and …
October 29, 2026
October 29, 2026 • 14-minute read
Media Coverage
Stephanie Noble Featured in Energy & Mineral Law Foundation Member Spotlight
Partner Stephanie Noble was featured in the Energy & Mineral Law Foundation (EMLF) Member Spotlight, where she discussed her path …
October 28, 2026
October 28, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins advised GridStor in connection with the financing of White Tank, a 100 MW / 400 MWh stand-alone …
October 28, 2026
October 28, 2026 • 1-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins Advises on Bison Oil & Gas IV’s Inaugural $600 Million Senior Notes Offering
Vinson & Elkins advised the initial purchasers in connection with Bison Oil & Gas IV, LLC’s inaugural private offering of …
October 28, 2026
October 28, 2026 • 1-minute read
Firm News
Vinson & Elkins Hires Corporate Partner Lisa Morales
Morales is an experienced M&A lawyer who advises major public companies, financial institutions, and private capital clients on strategic transactions. …
October 28, 2026
October 28, 2026 • 2-minute read
Deals & Cases
Vinson & Elkins Represents Perella Weinberg Partners as Financial Advisor in EQT Takeover of Qiagen
Vinson & Elkins is representing Perella Weinberg Partners as financial advisor to the Supervisory Board of Qiagen N.V. in connection …
October 22, 2026
October 22, 2026 • 1-minute read
Articles
Law Is a Practice. So Is Business Development.
Randi Revisore, Lauren Alford, and DeAnna Englezos reflect on two years of success leading BD Lab — Vinson & Elkins’ …
July 14, 2026 • V&E+ | Values
July 14, 2026 • 7-minute read
Articles
Data Center Dealmakers: A New Era of Power and Compute
Vinson & Elkins Partners Creighton Smith and Milam Newby share the story behind a groundbreaking AI infrastructure transaction — and …
June 15, 2026 • V&E+ Ventures
June 15, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Mid-Level Mindset: Empowering Lawyers Through a Pivotal Career Stage
Vinson & Elkins’ inaugural Mid-Level Associate Summit brought lawyers from across the firm to Houston for three days of learning …
March 31, 2026
March 31, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Pro Bono at Vinson & Elkins: Lawyers Changing Lives
Pro Bono Counsel Parker Cragg reflects on a life dedicated to service, returning to Vinson & Elkins, and wisdom he has picked up along the way.
October 20, 2025 • V&E+ Values
October 20, 2025 • 6-minute read
Client Alerts
The Genuine Cup: Soccer Strengthens Our Communities
Vinson & Elkins Chair Keith Fullenweider and Vice Chair Hilary Preston, alongside partners Creighton Smith and Jenny Speck, sit down for conversation on a global soccer tournament, the firm’s support for it, and their experience as spectators and volunteers.
August 27, 2025 • V&E+ Values
August 27, 2025 • 7-minute read
Thoughts or questions? Send us a note, and we’ll connect you with the right person.
our People
Please note that any communication with Vinson & Elkins via e-mail through this website does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with V&E. Please do not send any confidential information. A conflicts-of-interest procedure must be completed by V&E prior to establishment of an attorney-client relationship. When you execute an engagement letter from V&E you will be our client, and you may then exchange information freely with a V&E attorney.
By clicking “Accept,” you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if it is highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.