
James Dawson

2200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Suite 500 West
Washington, DC 20037

James Dawson is a litigator whose practice focuses on critical motions and appeals. He has been the principal author of dozens of appellate briefs and dispositive motions in a wide range of disputes pending in the United States Supreme Court, state and federal appellate courts, trial courts, and private arbitrations. He has significant experience with federal administrative law and energy law, and in particular disputes arising under the Natural Gas Act, the Federal Power Act, and the Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (“PURPA”). He was recently selected to the Super Lawyers “Rising Stars” list for his appellate work and was named to the 2022 “Ones to Watch – Appellate Practice” list by The Best Lawyers in America©.
James maintains an active pro bono practice, with a focus on voting rights and civil rights. While at V&E, James has also served as an instructor for the University of Virginia School of Law’s Supreme Court Litigation Clinic.
James received his J.D. from Yale Law School, where he was an editor of the Yale Law Journal and won the top team and individual prizes in the school’s moot court competition. Prior to joining V&E, he served as a law clerk on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and was a member of the Supreme Court and Appellate practice at another law firm.
Experience Highlights
(E.D. Tex.); (5th Cir.) – Drafted successful motion to dismiss in lawsuit challenging imposition of harbor dues to finance the costs of a billion-dollar project designed to deepen the nation’s leading hydrocarbon shipping channel; currently representing client on appeal in the Fifth Circuit
(D.D.C.); (D.C. Cir.) – Successfully defended dismissal of a lawsuit brought by landowners pursuing non-delegation and other challenges to the Natural Gas Act’s pipeline certification process and eminent domain authority
(FERC); (D.C. Cir.) – In pending appeal, principal drafter of appellate brief for an electric-utility trade association challenging a FERC order governing the standard for determining when a solar project constitutes a “qualifying facility” under PURPA
(9th Cir.) – In pending appeal, principal drafter of appellate brief for an electric-utility trade association in a dispute concerning challenges to a FERC rulemaking adopting programmatic revisions to the agency’s implementing regulations for PURPA
(Fed. Cir.) – Principal drafter of successful appellate briefs for Maxell, Ltd. and Maxell Corporation of America in appeal of order transferring the dispute to a new forum, resulting in denial of mandamus petition and our opponent’s withdrawal of a related appeal concerning similar issues
(3rd Cir.) – Drafted appellate brief successfully defending District Court’s ruling that an investment bank was not required to pay legal fees to a former employee convicted of criminal malfeasance in connection with his employment
(FERC); (D.C. Cir.) – Principal drafter of FERC protests challenging “qualifying facility” status for various projects under PURPA; currently representing utility client in multiple related D.C. Circuit appeals
(D.C. Cir.) – Successfully defended FERC authorization for proposed LNG terminal and feeder pipeline against NEPA supplementation, segmentation, cumulative impacts, and alternatives arguments; Court agreed to remand FERC authorization without vacatur for agency to undertake additional analysis of greenhouse gas and environmental justice considerations
(D.C. Cir.) – In pending appeal, defending FERC authorization for natural gas pipeline project, including conversion of dual use (oil/gas) to natural gas
(5th Cir.) – Drafted appellate brief in case successfully defending against challenge to a biological opinion issued by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service in connection with the development of a proposed LNG terminal and feeder pipeline
(5th Cir.) – Successfully obtained ripeness dismissal of appellate challenge to a Clean Water Act permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for a proposed LNG terminal and feeder pipeline
(FERC) – Principal drafter of a successful opposition to a petition for declaratory order in a dispute involving a state regulatory agency’s assessment of “network upgrade fees” in connection with the development of qualifying facilities under PURPA
(E.D. Tex.) – Obtained denial of preliminary injunction, successfully defending against environmental and landowner challenges to the construction of a pipeline connecting to the largest refinery in North America
(Del.) – Principal drafter of successful appellate brief in a dispute concerning purported breaches of a wind-farming contract; secured 5-0 “reverse and render” decision from the Delaware Supreme Court
(FERC); (Md.); (D.C. Cir.) — Represented major energy company in state and federal proceedings concerning a Clean Water Act certification for a hydroelectric facility
(D.R.I.) – Defending midstream natural gas pipeline in pending class action suit in connection with an equipment incident at a meter and regulating station that allegedly contributed to loss of gas pressure and temporary interruption in local gas service
(Tex. App. – Beaumont); (Tex.) – Representing upstream private-equity firm in multiple pending appeals concerning jurisdictional issues and purported tort liabilities
(6th Cir.) – Principal drafter of appellate brief in dispute concerning judicial sanctions and breaches of commercial contracts, resulting in favorable settlement of appeal prior to oral argument
(N.D. Ill.); (7th Cir.) – Represented major telecommunications company in trial and appellate proceedings concerning purported antitrust liabilities
(U.S.) – Lead associate in successful U.S. Supreme Court merits appeal concerning statute of limitations for refiling state-court claims dismissed by a federal court exercising supplemental jurisdiction
(U.S.) – Lead associate in successful U.S. Supreme Court merits appeal concerning constitutionality of “revocation on divorce” statutes applicable to life-insurance policies
(U.S.) – Lead associate in U.S. Supreme Court merits appeal concerning legality of tax credit-funded scholarships to fund school choice programs
(U.S.) – Member of briefing team in successful U.S. Supreme Court merits appeal concerning statute of limitations for SEC disgorgement proceedings
Represented music companies in a variety of commercial disputes against operators of music services
(Tex. App. – Fort Worth); (Tex. Crim. App.) – Filed multiple amicus curiae briefs in high-profile case challenging a conviction for purported “illegal voting;” obtained ruling from the Texas Court of Criminal appeals reversing lower court on issues related to the statute’s mens rea requirement
(Ill. Ct. App.) – Member of briefing team for appeal in which the court granted our client’s motion to vacate his conviction on the basis of junk arson science; client was ordered released from prison the day after the appellate brief was filed, after serving more than twenty years behind bars
(11th Cir.) – Briefed and argued appeal concerning federal criminal law
(S.D. III.) – In case concerning prison conditions, briefed and argued successful motion for spoliation sanctions, which was based on information uncovered during James’s depositions of the prison’s warden and litigation coordinator
(Tex.) – Principal author of amicus curiae brief successfully supporting a writ of mandamus in a case involving compensation owed by the State of Texas to a former prisoner found innocent of the crime for which he was convicted
(5th Cir.) – Drafted appellate briefs on behalf of federal prisoner pursuing a Bivens claim involving prison officials’ retaliation for the exercise of his First Amendment rights
(U.S.) – Filed cert. petition in case concerning legality of traffic stop initiated after officers suspected the Petitioner was violating state laws concerning texting while driving
(U.S.) – Filed cert. petition in case concerning right of Petitioner to appeal a conviction after he was erroneously advised by the trial court that he was not waiving his appellate rights
Credentials
- Yale Law School, J.D., 2014 (Yale Law and Policy Review, Co-Editor-in-Chief; Yale Law Journal, Notes Editor; Supreme Court Clinic; Morris Tyler Moot Court at Yale, best overall team and best individual oralist, teaching assistant for Dean Heather Gerken’s constitutional law small group)
- Columbia University, B.A. in Political Science summa cum laude, 2011 (Phi Beta Kappa)
- Judicial clerk to Judge Alex Kozinski, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2015 – 2016
- Lecturer in Law and Fellow for the San Francisco Affirmative Litigation Project, Yale Law School, 2014 – 2015
- Selected to the Washington, D.C. Rising Stars list, Super Lawyers® (Thomson Reuters), 2021 and 2022
- The Best Lawyers in America© (BL Rankings, LLC), “Ones to Watch,” Appellate Practice (Washington), 2022 and 2023
- Texas
- District of Columbia
- U.S. Supreme Court
- U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, Eleventh, D.C., and Federal Circuits
- U.S. District Courts for the District of Columbia, Eastern District of Texas, Southern District of Illinois, and Western District of Wisconsin
- InsightMarch 12, 2023
V&E Restructuring & Reorganization Update
- Deals & CasesSeptember 20, 2022
- Rankings & AwardsAugust 18, 2022
- Deals & CasesMay 16, 2022
- Rankings & AwardsMay 2, 2022
- InsightMarch 30, 2022
V&E Restructuring & Reorganization Update
- Rankings & AwardsApril 22, 2021
- Deals & CasesMarch 26, 2021
- Public Danger, 36 Cardozo L. Rev. 2183 (2015)
- Living Under Someone Else’s Law, 36 Democracy 42 (2015) (with Heather Gerken)
- Retroactivity Analysis After Brand X, 31 Yale J. on Reg. 219 (2014)
- Contract After Concepcion: Some Lessons from the State Courts, 124 Yale L.J. 233 (2014)
- Ritchie v. Rupe and the Future of Shareholder Oppression, 124 Yale L.J. Forum 89 (2014)