Overview

An accomplished lawyer with more than 30 years of experience, Paul is a partner in the Restructuring and Reorganization practice group. During his career, Paul has handled a multitude of complex chapter 11 bankruptcy cases and out-of-court restructuring matters. He regularly represents public and private companies, and advises their respective board of directors and senior management on developing solutions for reorganizing capital structures and business operations. His clients include companies in a range of industries, including cryptocurrency, energy, distribution, manufacturing, renewable power, retail, and telecommunications.

Read More

Experience

  • Axip Energy Services, LP, a provider of natural gas compression services to upstream and midstream customers, and certain of its affiliates in connection with their ongoing chapter 11 cases, including the negotiation and implementation of the sale of substantially all of the company’s assets

  • Strategic Materials, Inc., North America’s leading glass recycling company, and certain of its affiliates in their prepackaged chapter 11 cases that deleveraged the company’s capital structure by converting over 65% of the company’s approximately $430 million of prepetition secured funded debt into equity; the prepackaged chapter 11 plan was confirmed within only 37 days of commencing the chapter 11 cases in Houston

  • Riverstone Holdings LLC, its portfolio company, Talen Energy Corporation (TEC), and TEC’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Cumulus Growth Holdings LLC in the chapter 11 cases of TEC’s wholly-owned subsidiary Talen Energy Supply, LLC, which involved key settlements that paved the way for a consensual reorganization of Talen’s legacy power generation business and the Cumulus data center and cryptomining growth initiatives and allowed Riverstone to retain material equity positions in both TEC and Cumulus Growth

  • Bonanza Creek Energy in a merger to acquire HighPoint Resources Corporation that was valued at approximately $376 million, and included a registered exchange offer, consent solicitation, and simultaneous registered solicitation of a prepackaged plan of reorganization under chapter 11, which was followed by two subsequent out-of-court mergers and acquisitions by the combined company, resulting in a company with total expected enterprise value of $4.5 billion

  • Freeport McMoRan Inc. and Cyprus Amax Minerals Company in the chapter 11 cases of Cyprus Mines Corporation and Imerys Talc America Inc., filed in Delaware and involving alleged mass tort claims arising from exposure to talc and talc containing products

Expand All

Credentials

Education

  • The University of Texas School of Law, J.D. with honors
  • The University of Texas, B.B.A.

Admissions

  • Texas
  • U.S. District Courts for the Eastern, Northern, Southern, and Western Districts of Texas
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the Eleventh Circuit

Expand All

Recognitions

  • Lawdragon, 500 Leading Global Bankruptcy & Restructuring Lawyers Guide, 2024–2026
  • Chambers USA, Bankruptcy/Restructuring (Texas), 2007–2026
  • The Best Lawyers in America© (BL Rankings, LLC), Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights/Insolvency and Reorganization Law (Houston), 2007−2027
  • Legal 500 U.S., Finance: Restructuring (including Bankruptcy): Corporate, 2018, 2022, 2023, 2025, and 2026
Insights

Client Alerts

SCOTUS in Purdue: Non-Debtor Third-Party Releases Are Not Permitted in Chapter 11 Plans Without Consent

On June 27, 2024, the United States Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court” or “Court”) rendered a 5-4 opinion in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. that “the [B]ankruptcy [C]ode does not authorize a release and injunction that, as part of a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11, effectively seeks to discharge claims against a nondebtor without the consent of affected claimants.”

June 28, 2024 • V&E Restructuring & Reorganization Update

June 28, 2024 • 7-minute read

Should They Stay, and Will It Go? SCOTUS Weighs ETS’ Fate Background Image

Client Alerts

In re Purdue Pharma L.P.: Second Circuit Reverses S.D.N.Y and Holds Bankruptcy Court Has Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Statutory Authority to Approve Sackler Family Releases

On May 30, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the “Second Circuit” or the “Court”) rendered a much anticipated opinion (the “Opinion”),1 reversing the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “District Court”) that the Bankruptcy Code does not permit non-consensual third-party releases of direct claims and affirming the order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”) confirming the chapter 11 plan (the “Purdue Plan”) of Purdue Pharma L.P. (“Purdue”), which approved non-consensual third-party releases of the owners of Purdue — members of the Sackler family.

June 6, 2023 • V&E Restructuring & Reorganization Update

June 6, 2023 • 7-minute read

Should They Stay, and Will It Go? SCOTUS Weighs ETS’ Fate Background Image

Client Alerts

In re Boy Scouts of America and Delaware BSA, LLC: Delaware District Court Affirms Bankruptcy Court’s Approval of Third-Party Releases, in Conflict with Southern District of New York District Court in Purdue

On March 28, 2023, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (the “District Court”) rendered an opinion (the “Opinion”)1 affirming the confirmation order of Laurie S. Silverstein, of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”) that confirmed the chapter 11 plan (the “Plan”) of the Boy Scouts of America (“BSA”) (collectively, the “Confirmation Order”).2

May 2, 2023 • V&E Restructuring & Reorganization Update

May 2, 2023 • 8-minute read

Should They Stay, and Will It Go? SCOTUS Weighs ETS’ Fate Background Image

Client Alerts

Silicon Valley Bank FDIC Takeover

Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”), a key lender serving customers and borrowers primarily in the technology industry, was taken over by U.S. regulators on Friday, March 10, 2023. Included herein are considerations that may be top of mind for persons with connections to SVB.

March 12, 2023 • V&E Restructuring & Reorganization Update

March 12, 2023 • 2-minute read

Distressed Debt and Looming Maturities: Liability Management and Restructuring Strategies in the Time of COVID-19 Background Decorative Image

Client Alerts

Sanofi v. Mallinckrodt: Delaware Decision Highlights Importance of Asset Sale Structures in Later Bankruptcy Proceedings

In Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC v. Mallinckrodt PLC, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware ruled that a debtor that purchased intellectual property under a prepetition asset purchase agreement could continue to retain and use the property post-confirmation while discharging its obligations to pay any future royalties otherwise owed.

January 23, 2023 • V&E Restructuring & Reorganization Update

January 23, 2023 • 5-minute read

Should They Stay, and Will It Go? SCOTUS Weighs ETS’ Fate Background Image
News & Achievements