Client Alerts
On March 30, 2026, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Executive Order N-5-26 (the “Order”), directing state agencies to develop new …
March 31, 2026
March 31, 2026 • 5-minute read
Partner
Government Investigations & White Collar Criminal Defense and Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
Chris is a California-based litigator in Vinson & Elkins’ data privacy, government enforcement, and commercial litigation groups. He has a penchant for developing narratives and simplifying complex facts and systems, whether advising on internal compliance issues or matters with substantial exposure to criminal or civil liability.
His principal areas of practice include anti-corruption, fraud, antitrust, securities law, shareholder derivative suits, data privacy counseling and litigation, and corporate risk and compliance.
Chris works with a variety of individuals and private and public companies in technology, media, sports, consumer retail, finance and banking, and energy sectors. He represents clients in state and federal court, in arbitration, and in pre-litigation matters involving private plaintiffs and class actions, and opposite various government agencies such as the United States Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and other federal and state agencies. He also conducts compliance risk assessments and provides counseling on internal controls, employee and third-party training, and transactional diligence. Chris has been designated a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP/US) by the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP).
Chris is a founding member of the firm’s Government Enforcement publication, Regulatory Roundup, winner of JD Supra’s 2022 Reader’s Choice Award for White-Collar Defense.
Represented major sports league in class action litigation asserting violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA), based on the alleged use of Meta Pixel on webpages containing video
Represents popular consumer goods retailer in arbitrations asserting violations of California wiretapping (“CIPA”) and other privacy protections, based on the alleged use of website tracking technologies
Represents multiple clients in retail, sports and media in threatened and filed actions with class implications concerning consumer tracking consent protocols on public facing websites, including alleged violations of CIPA wiretapping, pen register, and trap-and-trace laws
Represents consumer money transfer business in class action data privacy litigation regarding the impact of subpoena responses on California privacy protections
Represented a chemical company in connection with a Department of Justice antitrust cartel grand jury investigation in which charges were not pursued
Represented a senior bank executive in connection with internal investigation and investigations by the SEC, DOJ, OCC and California AG of alleged securities and consumer fraud and banking regulation violations, in which no charges were pursued against client
Represented the audit committee of a public company in DOJ and SEC investigations concerning alleged FCPA violations in West Africa and the Middle East and provided counsel to the company regarding its compliance program
Represented the audit committee of a public company in an SEC investigation of alleged securities violations and provided counsel to the company on its compliance program
Represents clients in government enforcement inquiry concerning alleged violations of California’s Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”)
Represents executives in high-value real estate civil asset forfeiture case, concerning underlying allegations of bribery and money laundering
(Office of the Comptroller of Currency) Defended a former President and CEO of a Northern California bank in an OCC regulatory investigation; the OCC decided not to assess civil monetary penalties
Represented oil services company in an attempt by CA State AG to block an asset sale because of alleged antitrust concerns; obtained denial of preliminary injunction
Represented individual in DOJ investigation of healthcare and wire fraud
(N.D. Cal.) Represented an individual during sentencing phase of a federal antitrust auction rigging prosecution
Assisted in defending a leading automobile parts supplier and its affiliates in connection with multi-forum investigations and class action litigation involving alleged antitrust violations
(Cal. Sup. – Los Angeles Cnty.) Represented private investor in litigation over the failure of a multi-hundred million dollar California real estate venture
Represented Special Committee of former public energy company in shareholder derivative class action challenging merger transaction; plaintiffs determined to drop suit against clients following motion to dismiss
Represents private retail business and its executive management team in derivative action and offensive countersuit involving co-investors, and concerning issues of fraud, contract and fiduciary violations; obtained summary disposition eliminating majority of liability exposure, and litigated remaining issues through arbitration hearing (decision pending)
Represents private retail business in various contract and collection matters
(Cal. Sup. – Alameda Cnty.) Defended a retail manufacturer in California state court against allegations of carcinogenic product material under the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act (“Prop 65”)
Provides regular data privacy compliance counseling to sports, retail, and media clients, including consumer-facing policies and procedures, data collection and use disclosures, and consent program structure
Performed risk assessment, designed evaluation process, and advised global technology company on ethics and compliance issues as part of voluntary monitorship program
Conducted multiple internal investigations for a multinational technology manufacturing company in connection with supply chain risk
Conducted internal investigation on behalf of global company and its affiliates in connection with potential FCPA violations in Mexico
Investigated and advised audit committee of energy services company concerning internal complaints of alleged whistleblower employment discrimination
Counselled a multi-national oil services company on FCPA and anti-corruption compliance programs, as well as compliance issues related to international expansion
Advise numerous companies in M&A transactional due diligence evaluations of internal compliance programs and internal controls
Education
Admissions
Client Alerts
On March 30, 2026, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Executive Order N-5-26 (the “Order”), directing state agencies to develop new …
March 31, 2026
March 31, 2026 • 5-minute read
Client Alerts
Cartels: Antitrust Enforcement and Litigation
Over the last thirty years, Vinson & Elkins attorneys have played a leading role in some of the largest and most significant cartel matters worldwide.
September 15, 2025
September 15, 2025 • 1-minute read
Client Alerts
Case Closed: How We Took on the Government — and Won
Ephraim (Fry) Wernick and Chris James, partners in Vinson & Elkins’ Government Investigations practice, reflect on a long-running dispute with the US Department of Justice — and the hard-fought victory they secured for their clients.
November 15, 2024 • V&E+ Ventures
November 15, 2024 • 8-minute read
Client Alerts
For more than a decade, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) has been able to bring enforcement actions in either federal court or the agency’s internal venue.
June 28, 2024 • V&E SEC Update
June 28, 2024 • 6-minute read
Client Alerts
A Proactive Playbook in a Digital World: Managing Data Preservation In Software-Based Litigation
It’s an ever-present threat in our digital world: You get sued, and the case involves your software, website, and/or customer data. The first step in any filed or threatened litigation is to implement a litigation hold to satisfy your preservation obligations. But what do you do?
July 3, 2023
July 3, 2023 • 7-minute read
Awards & Rankings
Lawdragon Honors Seven Vinson & Elkins Lawyers Among Top 500 Global Cybersecurity Lawyers
Lawdragon named seven Vinson & Elkins lawyers to its 2025 500 Global Cyber Lawyers Guide.
May 13, 2025
May 13, 2025 • 1-minute read
Firm News
In June 2024, Vinson & Elkins, LLP secured the successful closure of a high-profile DOJ investigation, which included a favorable …
July 9, 2024
July 9, 2024 • 2-minute read
Awards & Rankings
The Legal 500 US 2024 recommended Vinson & Elkins as a leading law firm in 44 categories. In total, 131 attorneys are recognized, many in more than one category. Vinson & Elkins attorneys earned 27 special designations, such as “Hall of Fame,” “Leading Lawyer,” “Next Generation Partner,” and “Rising Star.”
June 12, 2024
June 12, 2024 • 3-minute read
Awards & Rankings
The Best Lawyers in America has named 124 Vinson & Elkins lawyers in its “Best Lawyers” category in the 2024 edition. Additionally, 87 Vinson & Elkins attorneys have been named in the Ones to Watch category, which recognizes lawyers with 5-10 years’ experience. Some individuals are listed in more than one practice area, giving the firm a total of 308 rankings.
August 21, 2023
August 21, 2023 • 2-minute read
Awards & Rankings
Super Lawyers has recognized two Vinson & Elkins lawyers to the 2023 Northern California Super Lawyers list. Additionally, two attorneys have been selected for the Northern California Rising Stars list.
June 27, 2023
June 27, 2023 • 1-minute read
our People
Please note that any communication with Vinson & Elkins via e-mail through this website does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with V&E. Please do not send any confidential information. A conflicts-of-interest procedure must be completed by V&E prior to establishment of an attorney-client relationship. When you execute an engagement letter from V&E you will be our client, and you may then exchange information freely with a V&E attorney.
By clicking “Accept,” you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if it is highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.