Water Blog

  • 22
  • July
  • 2016


Share on:

Texas/New Mexico Water Fight May Make It to the U.S. Supreme Court

The longstanding dispute between Texas and New Mexico with regard to water apportionment from the Rio Grande might make it to the Supreme Court after all. Approximately three and a half years ago, Texas filed a complaint in the U.S. Supreme Court alleging that New Mexico was taking too much water from the Rio Grande in violation of the Rio Grande Compact and the Rio Grande Project Act, which allegedly allocate the Rio Grande water among the three parties.

Read More
  • 16
  • June
  • 2016


Share on:

EPA Releases Final Rule Prohibiting Discharge of Unconventional EandP Wastewaters to Public Treatment Facilities

On June 13, EPA released its final rule prohibiting unconventional oil and gas well operators from discharging wastewater to publicly-owned treatment works (“POTWs”). The final rule only applies to unconventional oil and gas well operators; conventional wells and coalbed methane extraction facilities are unaffected. 

Read More

What U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., Inc. Might Mean for the Corp’s JD Program and Clean Water Act Enforcement

The Supreme Court dealt the Obama Administration another Clean Water Act loss on May 31, 2016, ruling unanimously that landowners can more quickly go to court to challenge the federal government when it claims Clean Water Act jurisdiction over their property. 

Read More

EPA Accused of Deceiving District Court Regarding Blending and Mixing Zone Policies Under CWA

The most recent development in EPA’s struggle with challenges to its ‘blending’ and ‘mixing zones’ policies is interesting, to say the least. On May 2, 2016, in a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) lawsuit in the District Court for the District of Columbia, EPA was accused by plaintiff Hall & Associates (H&A) of misleading the court when it submitted a declaration that the plaintiffs characterized as “a complete and utter fabrication.”

Read More
  • 06
  • May
  • 2016


Share on:

Enviros Launch New Assault Against RCRA E&P Exemption

On May 4, 2016, the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), the Environmental Integrity Project (EIP), Earthworks, and three other environmental groups filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).  The suit seeks to compel the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to review, and, if necessary, promulgate revised regulations and guidelines for the disposal, storage, transportation, and handling of oil and natural gas wastes.  

Read More

Sixth Circuit Declines to Revisit Its Decision to Keep Jurisdiction Over WOTUS Litigation

On Thursday, April 21, the full Sixth Circuit denied six petitions for en banc rehearing of a three-judge panel’s February 2016 decision that the court of appeals has jurisdiction to hear challenges to the controversial Waters of the United States (“WOTUS”) rule. The decision is a disappointment for states and industry groups, who seek to litigate the rule in district courts across the country.

Read More

White House Announces Another Plank in its Environmental Platform - Plan for a Sustainable Water Future

As it looks down the home stretch of its second term, the Obama Administration has been steadily ramping up measures to solidify its environmental legacy, particularly with its climate change agenda. Linked to its climate change measures is a recent Administration announcement of a program for addressing challenges with the use, conservation, and availability of water in the United States. The White House believes that the country will experience more frequent, intense, and longer droughts because of climate change impacts.

Read More
  • 05
  • April
  • 2016

Share on:

Oral Arguments Heard at the Supreme Court in Hawkes Matter

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., a case challenging federal regulations that prohibit court review of Corps opinions regarding whether wetlands are subject to jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act.

Read More

WOTUS Challengers Begin Responding to the Sixth Circuit’s Order Retaining Jurisdiction

Yesterday, we wrote about last week’s Sixth Circuit decision to keep jurisdiction over challenges to the federal government’s rule redefining “Waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”) under the Clean Water Act. We suggested that given the fractured nature of the Sixth Circuit panel’s opinion, the case was ripe for parties to request en banc rehearing before the full Sixth Circuit.

Read More

American Farm Bureau Federation, et al. v. EPA: The Reach of EPA’s TMDL Authority

On February 17, 2016, the Supreme Court announced that its February 19 conference, where it was scheduled to decide whether to take up a challenge to the Environmental Protection Agency’s Chesapeake Bay total maximum daily load (“TMDL”), would be delayed following the death of Justice Scalia.

Read More

Decision Invalidating TCEQ’s Drought Curtailment Rules is Final

On February 19, 2016, the Texas Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to a lower court ruling in Texas Commission on Environmental Quality v. Texas Farm Bureau et al., which held that Texas cannot treat cities and power generators preferentially compared to parties with more senior water rights, even if the state declares it necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare.

Read More

Sign Up for Updates

Receive email news and alerts about Water from V&E

Top Posts

Follow Us On Linkedin


Susan B. Snyder

Susan B. Snyder Partner

Andrew R. Stewart

Andrew R. Stewart Counsel

Margaret E. Peloso

Margaret E. Peloso Senior Associate

Taylor R. Pullins

Taylor R. Pullins Counsel

Theresa Romanosky

Theresa Romanosky Associate

Corinne Snow

Corinne Snow Associate

Brandon M. Tuck

Brandon M. Tuck Senior Associate

Ross Woessner

Ross Woessner Associate

Jay Rothrock

Jay Rothrock Senior Associate