week, we wrote that Apple found itself in hot water when a federal magistrate
imposed a $300,000 sanction against the company for failing to meet a Rule 45
(third-party subpoena) document production deadline in the Federal Trade
Commission’s (“FTC”) case against Qualcomm Inc. In the sanction order, the
magistrate cited a similar sanction against Samsung for untimely document production
to Apple in an unrelated suit, Apple Inc.
v. Samsung Elecs. Co., No. 11-CV-01846 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2012) [ECF No.