X

Reset Password

Username:

Change Password

Old Password:
New Password:
We have completed your request.

High-Tech Law & Litigation Blog

  • 12
  • January
  • 2018

Authors:

Share on:

FTC Reaches First COPPA Settlement With Connected Toy Manufacturer

Earlier this week, the Federal Trade Commission announced that it had reached a settlement with VTech Electronics Limited, a Chinese manufacturer of electronic learning toys, and its North American subsidiary over charges that VTech violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule (“COPPA”), a rule designed to “strengthen kids’ privacy protections and give parents greater control over the personal information that websites and online services may collect from children under 13.” The FTC’s complaint centered on three web-based platforms VTech created and maintained to support its numerous connected toys. The platforms are the Learning Lodge Navigator, a platform akin to Apple’s App Store that allows users to download games and content to their VTech devices; Kid Connect, a children’s messaging app for smart phones; and Planet VTech, an online platform that allows online game play and messaging between users. Each of these products allowed for children to share personal information or required registration from parents, including information such as a child’s name and age. In some instances, VTech stated that the collected information would be encrypted, which it was not.

Read More
  • 21
  • November
  • 2017

Authors:

Share on:

Suggestion and Innuendo Held Insufficient To Create Federal Jurisdiction in Qualcomm Patent Licensing Litigation

Qualcomm scored a victory in one of the many battles in its war with Apple and others surrounding licensing practices for baseband processors. In July, Apple — which is suing Qualcomm for allegedly overcharging for licenses to use its chip patents and withholding over a billion dollars in royalties — amended a pending complaint to add claims relating to an additional nine patents-in-suit. In August, Qualcomm moved to dismiss the additional claims relating to those nine patents on the grounds that the court lacked declaratory judgment jurisdiction to hear the claims. This month, the Southern District of California dismissed the additional claims, agreeing with Qualcomm that jurisdiction did not exist.

Read More
  • 30
  • August
  • 2017

Author:

Share on:

Qualcomm and Apple Further Their Dispute About Whether Certain Patents Are, In Fact, Disputed

A series of motions in the ongoing battle between tech blue chips Qualcomm and Apple about whether the Southern District of California (or any federal court) has jurisdiction to hear additional patents-in-suit in Apple’s amended complaint raises the question of exactly what actions a patent holder must undertake to create an actual case or controversy for a patent-law declaratory judgment action.

Read More

Dates

Subscribe for Updates

Receive e-mail updates from the V&E High-Tech Blog team

Follow Us On Linkedin

Contributors

Jason A. Levine

Jason A. Levine Partner

Jennifer C. Chen

Jennifer C. Chen Partner

Devika Kornbacher

Devika Kornbacher Partner

Danny Tobey

Danny Tobey Partner

William R. Vigdor

William R. Vigdor Partner

Marc A. Fuller

Marc A. Fuller Counsel

John Andren

John Andren Associate

Thomas W. Bohnett

Thomas W. Bohnett Associate

Megan Coker

Megan Coker Associate

Caroline Colpoys

Caroline Colpoys

Trey Hebert

Trey Hebert Associate

Keeney, Jeremy C.

Jeremy C. Keeney Associate

Howard Lithaw Lim Associate

Kimberly R. McCoy

Kimberly R. McCoy Senior Associate

Elizabeth Krabill McIntyre

Elizabeth Krabill McIntyre Senior Associate

David C. Smith

David C. Smith Senior Associate

Janice Ta

Janice Ta Senior Associate

Margaret D. Terwey

Margaret Dunlay Terwey Associate

Ryan B. Will

Ryan Will Associate

Siho (Scott) Yoo

Siho (Scott) Yoo Senior Associate