Lawyers
Lawyer Search
News, Publications, Events
News
Publications
Events
Practices
Industries
Corporate
Finance
Restructuring and Reorganization
Tax, Benefits, and Compensation
Employment, Labor and OSHA
Environmental
International
Litigation
Intellectual Property
Regulatory/Public Policy
Rankings
Rankings Search
Offices
Abu Dhabi
Austin
Beijing
Dallas
Dubai
Hong Kong
Houston
London
Moscow
New York
Palo Alto
Riyadh
San Francisco
Shanghai
Tokyo
Washington
Careers
Law Students
Professional Development
Public Interest Split Summer Program
Judicial Clerkships
Laterals
London Recruitment
Paralegals
Administrative
About V&E
Introduction
Pro Bono
Community
Diversity and Inclusion
Women's Initiative
Search Entire Site
Lawyers
News, Publications, Events
Practices
Rankings
Offices
Careers
About V&E
Home
>
News, Publications, Events
>
Publications
>
Could the Supreme Court’s Enforcement of Arbitration in
Concepcion
Reverberate in the Securities Litigation Sphere?
Publication
Could the Supreme Court’s Enforcement of Arbitration in
Concepcion
Reverberate in the Securities Litigation Sphere?
First published by
Securities Litigation Report
, September 2011
By
Jennifer Poppe
and
Alithea Sullivan
A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision may cause corporations to reconsider a possible way to avoid costly and often counter-productive securities class actions. In
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
, the Court on April 27, 2011, upheld the enforceability of contractual arbitration clauses that waive a consumer’s right to bring a class action. This decision has been hyped as both a “dramatic example of judicial activism” and the “class action shot heard ‘round the world” because it gives businesses a way to significantly reduce — if not eliminate entirely — consumer class actions.
Read the entire article
here
.
This information is provided by Vinson & Elkins LLP for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended, nor should it be construed, as legal advice.
<< Back to Top
Site Map
Contact Us
Extranet
Disclaimer & Legal Notice
©1999-2012 Vinson & Elkins LLP
RSS