X

Reset Password

Username:

Change Password

Old Password:
New Password:
We have completed your request.

New Proposed Regulations for BBA Partnership Audits Allow for Push Out Elections in Tiered Partnerships

V&E Tax Update E-communication, December 19, 2017

This e-lert focuses on certain issues regarding “push out” elections under the BBA partnership audit regime. Those elections are discussed in more detail in the article accompanying the October 4, 2017 e-lert.

Almost lost in Friday’s tax reform frenzy was the release of additional proposed regulations regarding the new partnership audit regime under the Bipartisan Budget Act (“BBA”). Most importantly, those proposed regulations answer IN THE AFFIRMATIVE the critical question of whether “push out” elections will be available in tiered partnership structures.

The process for push out elections through a tiered structure works as cascading elections available throughout a chain of tiered partnerships. At each level, a partnership that is a direct or indirect partner in the audited partnership has the ability to itself make a push out election or else pay its own imputed underpayment relating to the audit adjustment. If the upper-tier partnership makes a push out election, it is generally subject to same reporting requirements as imposed with respect to the original push out election made by the audited partnership. If the upper-tier partnership does not make a push out election — either because it decides not to or because the deadline for making that election has passed (see below), then the upper-tier partnership must pay its imputed underpayment amount as determined under the statutory provisions of the BBA.

The new proposed regulations do not impose a limit on the number of tiered partnerships through which cascading push out elections may be made. However, as noted above, there is a single time period for making any and all such cascading push out elections. That limit is the extended due date for filing the tax return for the audited partnership for the tax year in which the adjustments become final. For example, assume there is an audit for Partnership ABC’s 2018 tax year which is resolved in 2020 with agreed adjustments. The deadline for push out elections with respect to those adjustments is the extended due date for Partnership ABC’s 2020 tax return — or September 15, 2021 assuming a calendar tax year. Assuming Partnership ABC makes a push out election, and if the partners in Partnership ABC include partnerships, those upper-tier partnerships can themselves make push out elections, but all such elections must be made by September 15, 2021. Like the push out election at the audited partnership, the push out election at an upper-tier partnership pushes out the adjustments to partners in the partnership during the reviewed year (i.e., 2018 in this example).

If there are multiple layers of tiered partnerships, these cascading elections will create time pressures on making the elections and furnishing the required statements in order to give partnerships further up the chain time to themselves make push out elections. Any partnerships in the chain that do not make the push out election before the deadline will be required to pay their imputed underpayment amount with respect to their allocable share of the adjustments. Also, the availability of push out elections in tiered structures is not limited to upper-tier partnerships but also includes S corporations, certain trusts, and decedents’ estates.

In addition to tiered push out elections, the new proposed regulations address other mechanical issues relating to the BBA. These include issues relating to assessment, collection, penalties, interest and period of limitations. These latest proposed regulations do not address the impact on capital accounts and basis from BBA adjustments and tax payments. Those issues should be addressed in future regulations.

Visit our website to learn more about V&E’s Transactional Tax practice. For more information, please contact Vinson & Elkins lawyers Ryan Carney, David Cole, George Gerachis, Gary Huffman, David Peck, or Todd Way.


Key Contacts

+1.713.758.4720
rcarney@velaw.com
+1.713.758.2543
dcole@velaw.com
+1.713.758.1056
ggerachis@velaw.com
+1.202.639.6771
ghuffman@velaw.com
+1.214.220.7937
dpeck@velaw.com
+1.214.220.7942
tway@velaw.com

Connect with V&E

Stay informed by receiving our e-lerts. Select your preferred communications.

Related Practices

This information is provided by Vinson & Elkins LLP for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended, nor should it be construed, as legal advice.